Subject:
|
Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:38:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
262 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
Right so even that article said the “16-year-old kid” broke into his home. If
your old enough to commit the crime your old enough get shot for it. I for
one would not let someone survive breaking into my home regardless of which
direction their facing. I am not stupid enough to risk my life by shouting
“freeze.” Of course I would just as easily shove a sword through said persons
throat as shoot them. I don’t know maybe people just don’t get the concept of
kill or be killed.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
Nice. Burgler != killer.
So the ‘kill or be killed’ application does not apply.
Sure you don’t know the intention of said burgler, but because he broke one law
doesn’t immediately mean he ‘s going to commit murder.
If we justified killing someone because they broke the law, eeveryone that
passes me on the highway would forfeit thier lives to your sword.
And stealing a 200 dollar TV does not warrant a death sentence in either of our
two contries.
The inherent violence in the system. And you wonder why you’re labelled as a
bunch of gun toting yahoos.
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
