Subject:
|
Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:42:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
705 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
> Perhaps most of you think I would be over-reacting but frankly my life and
> the lives of my loved ones comes first inside my own home.
I think the real difference lies in what you and I identify to constitute an
immediate threat to oneself and one's family. It seems that you equate the act
of breaking-in with the intent to inflict bodily harm, whereas I distinguish
between the break-in and the intention of injury. Granted, some cases of home
invasion appear to be motivated primarily by the desire to inflict harm, but
such invasions are a statistically smaller portion of break-ins overall.
Another hypothetical example occurred to me over the weekend, evoking a
previous debate. I'd be interested to hear your response:
8. The intruder is a woman who doesn't know that she's four weeks pregnant;
you shoot her in the gut to incapacitate her and thereby kill her embryo; are
you responsible for the death of her innocent child?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
