To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19994
19993  |  19995
Subject: 
Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:17:33 GMT
Viewed: 
598 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

<snip>


2 - I'm singling out the DPRK as an example not because it's the only
country that the US is better than, but because there's such a huge gulf
between them that it cuts away the "US is better than Canada, no it isn't"
argument that distracts from the main point.

But here's where you're missing the point, Larry--If we use your very own
rationale, I'd say that Canada should have 5 votes to your 1, because we're
so much better than you--we have contributed, per capita, more money to
foreign aid, known for our peacekeeping forces, and are not pissing
countries off at every opportunity.

By your logic, a nobel laureate and Bill Gates should have more "voting
power" than Joe Schmoo living in a shack in the outback in Arizona in your
next election.

But that's not how it works--everyone, no matter the background, has the
same voice--one person, one vote, or it doesn't work for *all*.

But why am I trying to explain democracy to Americans?

Dave K



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
 
(...) OK... one person one vote... that was a proposed metric too. In that case, the US gets what, 10 times the votes that Canada does? And India gets 5 times again since it's 5 times bigger than the US (I didn't look the exact figures up, you get (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
 
(...) Thanks for trying to clear this up. Use potential, use probability, whatever you like... what I was trying to convey was the likeliehood that a system of government will be able to continue to deliver (1) higher quality of life, higher (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

79 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR