To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19994
19993  |  19995
Subject: 
Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:17:33 GMT
Viewed: 
2246 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

<snip>


> 2 - I'm singling out the DPRK as an example not because it's the only
> country that the US is better than, but because there's such a huge gulf
> between them that it cuts away the "US is better than Canada, no it isn't"
> argument that distracts from the main point.

But here's where you're missing the point, Larry--If we use your very own
rationale, I'd say that Canada should have 5 votes to your 1, because we're
so much better than you--we have contributed, per capita, more money to
foreign aid, known for our peacekeeping forces, and are not pissing
countries off at every opportunity.

By your logic, a nobel laureate and Bill Gates should have more "voting
power" than Joe Schmoo living in a shack in the outback in Arizona in your
next election.

But that's not how it works--everyone, no matter the background, has the
same voice--one person, one vote, or it doesn't work for *all*.

But why am I trying to explain democracy to Americans?

Dave K



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
 
(...) OK... one person one vote... that was a proposed metric too. In that case, the US gets what, 10 times the votes that Canada does? And India gets 5 times again since it's 5 times bigger than the US (I didn't look the exact figures up, you get (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
 
(...) Thanks for trying to clear this up. Use potential, use probability, whatever you like... what I was trying to convey was the likeliehood that a system of government will be able to continue to deliver (1) higher quality of life, higher (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

79 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR