Subject:
|
Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 20:57:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
664 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> What payment scale would you set up to a 'better' United Nations so that all
> countries would be represented fairly?
Everyone pays whatever they want and then votes in direct proportion to how
much they paid in order to decide what to do.
So to implement the onion-vision all the US has to do is pay 51% (and that
will work as long as the whole rest of the world doesn't stump up more money
to outvote them)
Set a minimum budget for the UN and if the UN budget drops below that, it
goes out of business.
OR everyone pays some amount as a minimum (per capita seems fair) and can't
go below that
or something... I'm brainstorming here, not advocating.
The way it's set now is broken though.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
79 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
