Subject:
|
Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 23:10:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
828 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> >
> > Uh, Lar, that may not be such a good idea - the US has a long history
> > of failing to pay US dues. If the vote was based on current, true,
> > paid-up dues, there would
> > be many times when the US would have ZERO votes due to being in arrears.
> >
> > The idea makes sense to me, but with our past history, it wouldn't
> > bode well for the US.
>
> That's part of the original argument. If we don't get a vote unless we're
> paid up, we (and other nations as well) will be falling all over ourselves
> to pay up. ESPECIALLY if we get a 25% or so vote because of it.
I think it more likely we would end up falling over ourselves to do
back-door deals in order to avoid paying.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
79 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
