To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17716
17715  |  17717
Subject: 
Re: red light cameras CAUSE accidents
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:08:21 GMT
Viewed: 
427 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

Normally the focus is on the "intergreen" period - this will be 5-7 seconds
for a bogg-standard 30 mph set-up. This includes the red/amber (“get ready”)
and amber times (yes, I am a civil engineer).

  Forget all that.  Can you tell me why, when I see those Police Video shows
from the UK, the surveillance cameras in the cop cars always show the speed
in MPH?  Are you folks finally seeing the light and giving up on that
cumbersome, counter-intuitive so-called "metric" system of yours??

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: red light cameras CAUSE accidents
 
(...) We don't have "cop cars", we have "police cars", "panda" cars and "jam sandwiches". ;) (...) Road signs (speed and distances) have always been in MPH. I have no idea why that was seen as being worth keeping. Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: red light cameras CAUSE accidents
 
(...) Not in the UK. We always have to maintain a safe stopping distance... which makes sense. As I understand it, the length of the yellow is some kind of (...) Normally the focus is on the "intergreen" period - this will be 5-7 seconds for a (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

62 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR