To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17705
17704  |  17706
Subject: 
Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:21:22 GMT
Viewed: 
359 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
I'm not sure why I continue debating here. It's hard to see all the
sides of a person when the debate draws out like this. My initial
reaction to this incident was based on a number of incidents in a very
short time. In all likelihood I am overreacting, but remember, when we
fail to question the legal process on a regular basis we risk the
questions not being asked when the person is in fact innocent.

I don't know what to think.

I do know that what I have read is that hundreds were detained after
9-11. Sure, many of them ARE guilty of minor documentation problems, but
is that reason to suddenly change the rules? Is that reason to lock them
up secretly and deny them lawyers? Is that reason to lock them up
secretly and deny them access to their countries diplomats?

This year seems to have presented a large number of incidents of child
abduction. Probably one thing which is happening is there is more
reporting. I think we are all on edge since 9-11. In one way, the extra
vigilance is good.

As far as the video, it does sound pretty damning. I don't subscribe to
CNN and don't watch TV much at all, so I haven't seen it. I saw nothing
however in the article I read to indicate the level. The article didn't
mention the baby's head bouncing. I think it is right to not rely
totally on video. By it's graphic nature, it can raise very strong
emotions, and it can be easy to overlook less sinister causes for what
is being seen. I'm glad more information is coming out.

As for my own fears of working with children, obviously they are not
crippling me. I wouldn't have just started working with a new group of
children in my new church if I was so afraid. It just scares me that the
way we react to child abuse accusations can so quickly destroy someone's
life. On one level, I can understand the Florida teaching hospital's
reluctance to continue with those students, what would we say if they
later turned out to be terrorists? We would rip that hospital to shreds
for taking them on. I see the same potential if someone is falsely
accused of child abuse. Would any place which provides for children be
willing to take on someone who has a mark on their record?

Maybe it's not really such a problem, I don't know. I just don't know.

Frank

I was just talking with one of my friends (who happens to be a parent--no so
with me) and he makes an astute observation--

Would this incident even be discussed if there was no 'art'?  I mean, you
take a kid, broken arms, cigarette burns, bruised all over his or her body,
at hte hospital, and because there's no film or photo, there's no sound bite
the media can sensationalize.

What she did was wrong--punching and slapping, imho, undue force on a child.

I, however, have seen many parents slap the hands of their kids when the kid
reaches for something they shouldn't.  The slap is accompanyied by an
explanation like 'Hot!' or 'Sharp' or something.  I have seen parents do the
'time out' thing in the corner, which appears to work well, but sometimes
the child doesn't stop whatever he or she is doing, and doesn't come when
the parent calls, so the parent goes over and 'swats' the fanny of the
child--not a heavy handed slap, just a quick slap on the bum--usually gets
the childs atttention.

But anyway, the line is very wide and very gray for me, and I won't know
where I come down on it until I become a parent.

Anyway, like Frank, sometimes I just don't know.

One thing I do know is that if your child ends up in the hospital because of
your type of punishment, it's probably just a little over the top.

Dave K



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) I hope this was intentional understatement. If your child ends up in the hospital because of your type of punishment, your right to associate with small people should be stripped from you and you should be incarcerated in a psychiatric (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
I'm not sure why I continue debating here. It's hard to see all the sides of a person when the debate draws out like this. My initial reaction to this incident was based on a number of incidents in a very short time. In all likelihood I am (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

62 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR