Subject:
|
Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:55:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
436 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> Dave Schuler wrote:
> >
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> >
> > > > I'm not sure why I continue debating here.
> > >
> > > After a brief thought, and remembering from a class I took yesterday on
> > > the Meyers Briggs Type Indicator, I was just thinking of something that
> > > might be useful to add here about my debating style. As an ENFP, my way
> > > of working through problems is to voice them out, so just because I have
> > > said something, doesn't mean that that's my final reasoned answer. Of
> > > course this is what I wish .debate could be, and opportunity to work
> > > through issues by sharing thoughts and creating a dialog which helps me
> > > reach a decision. It can happen, but I have seen less and less of it,
> > > and more attacking of individuals.
> >
> > Well, you're just a silly goofball for thinking that in ridiculous way.
> >
> > What's an ENFP?
>
> http://www.recruit-china.com/Career/MBTI/ENFP
>
> You can find hundreds of descriptions on the web. This was the first
> which had an extensive description.
>
> Frank
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes1.htm
Here's a quick test--it's not definitive, but it did peg me at the same
thing the test I took in high school, college and university pegged me at
(ENFP), and recently it pegged me at INFP... less the partier I gather ;)
Dave K.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
62 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
