Subject:
|
Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:58:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
439 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> Frank Filz wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure why I continue debating here.
>
> After a brief thought, and remembering from a class I took yesterday on
> the Meyers Briggs Type Indicator, I was just thinking of something that
> might be useful to add here about my debating style. As an ENFP, my way
> of working through problems is to voice them out, so just because I have
> said something, doesn't mean that that's my final reasoned answer. Of
> course this is what I wish .debate could be, and opportunity to work
> through issues by sharing thoughts and creating a dialog which helps me
> reach a decision. It can happen, but I have seen less and less of it,
> and more attacking of individuals.
Did you feel like I was attacking you? I was kind of perplexed at your
response to my response, but to see this actually worries me. I thought
that we _were_ working through an issue by sharing our thoughts in a dialog.
Maybe we have root-level misunderstandings that are getting in the way of
productive dialog.
I in no way meant to be berating you or otherwise hostile. Was it the crazy
thing? I was kidding around. But I do have a stance and I expressed it.
Do you discount my analogy to shark attack as an example of highly
noteworthy tiny statistics?
Sorry,
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
62 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
