Subject:
|
Re: Brainstorming ideas for Game Project....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:05:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4725 times
|
| |
|
|
"Hendo (John P. Henderson)" wrote:
>
> In lugnet.castle, Alex Polimeni writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, John P. Henderson writes:
> > > FYI,
> > >
> > > I just posted towards this thread, but placed it in .fun.gaming. I agree
> > > that is where it belongs. Anyone who wants to mix Lego Castle with gaming
> > > is welcome to follow there. Thanks!
> > >
> > > -H.
> >
> > My proposed idea: make CastleQuest a sub group of Castle. this is where it
> > belongs, because, as i stated in my last post, it is not just a game. if it
> > cant fit in castle OR gaming, put it in between.
> >
> > Also, your putting this in .fun.gaming without a total agreement.
>
> I am just stirring up trouble left in right lately. Maybe my thoughts are
> not in line with some of the other posters in .castle or this thread.
> Should I just stop and not contribute? (I mean these comments with a touch
> of humor, though if people seriously feel I am slowing the process of your
> discussions on current topics, it's not like I can't have fun in another
> certain group around here...)
>
> > Can we vote on this? (sorry if this sounds dumb, but its accurate.)
>
> Fair enough. Get those involved (and those who might be affected) and have
> a vote. I assume these are the choices:
>
> Where should development of the rules of a CastleQuest RPG be discussed:
>
> 1. lugnet.castle
> 2. lugnet.fun.gaming
> 3. a new group just for CQ, such as lugnet.castle.cq
> 4. another message board establish off of lugnet just for CQ
> 5. email only
> 6. in person
> 7. some other forum not mentioned here
> 8. not at all
>
> If these were the choices, I would vote for #2, and suggest just advertising
> CQ on occasion in .castle during announcements. Actually, I would agree
> that, if the game can prove a following, then #3 would be good too, but
> establishing a new group doesn't seem to be easy to do and could take a while.
>
> For the record, the gang involved in SS used option #4.
I'm not sure how appropriate a vote is. Ultimately, people can do what
they feel like, and if things get out of hand, a Lugnet admin will step
in. I feel that a pretty good case has been made that game mechanics
discussion belongs in lugnet.fun.gaming not in lugnet.castle.
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brainstorming ideas for Game Project....
|
| Hi everybody, I don't understand what's the fuss is all about. All of you always complains that nothing happens in .Castle, that .Space making much more projects then we are, etc..., but when some1 does try to suggest/do something you all attack him (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brainstorming ideas for Game Project....
|
| (...) I am just stirring up trouble left in right lately. Maybe my thoughts are not in line with some of the other posters in .castle or this thread. Should I just stop and not contribute? (I mean these comments with a touch of humor, though if (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
