| |
Dave Johann wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Thomas Stangl writes:
> > My deal is that you are wasting everyone's time, asking for "outsiders" to
> > take up the reins for "your" group, because "you" (meaning you and any
> > .mecha regular) are too lazy to do so.
>
> This statement alone is more than enough to TICK ME OFF! There is no
> laziness involved at all. I have the FTX knowledge and gumption to get the
> job done. Funny thing about the .build.mecha page though...when I go to it,
> I see no discernable way to alter the page. Hmmm...could it be because my
> requests to become curator of the group have been ignored more than once? Yep!
Well now, THAT is a legitimate complaint. Then again, this is the first mention of
that in .debate.
I'm curious as to why Suz took the time to update the links, rather than just take
the time to set you up as curator.
Perhaps you need to ping her again for an update?
> > Why the HECK should someone with absolutely no interest in mecha >spend the
> > time to curate the page when you mecha people are whining about how >little
> > time you have to do so?
>
> Another bad ass-umption. No one wants a non-mecha builder as the mecha
> curator, but when those who live and breathe mecha aren't given the
> position, then what's the solution? I've been waiting 9 months to find out
> the answer to this question.
Well thanks for the update. Eric has mentioned nothing of this. And I'm not going
to slog through 100s or 1000s of .mecha messages to find the one post where he did.
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
62 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
