Subject:
|
Re: Posting Dates
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:32:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1802 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Were I proposing an elaborate technical solution I would suggest that
> some sort of sanity check be carried out... if LUGNET determined that
> "some time" had went by between the date on the message and the day
> that it was at the time that it would be posted, it could mail it
> back to the originator and ask if it was truly still desired that it
> be posted
>
> But I'm not proposing such a solution as I suspect it raises more
> problems than it solves.
I'd much rather have unauthorized posts expire after a week or so,
perhaps with a reminder a couple of days before they do.
That's the way I'm leaning twards right now - not saying that it'll be
implemented anytime soon, of course :)
Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) ?? Wouldn't it show up in their mail on the day it actually got posted rather than the day it was sent, queued up and was intended to be posted? A mail interface person who didn't closely check the date on the mail, or a newsreader person (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
83 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
