Subject:
|
Re: Posting Dates
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 21:08:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1833 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Gerber wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Doucette wrote:
> > > I thought this NNTP date posted/approved thing was corrected.
> >
> > I don't see it as broken. The date of a message is the date it was
> > composed. The date it was posted is unimportant, imo.
>
> That would only be true if the message somehow just showed up where it
> belonged in line. If it posts as a new message 28 days later, it is
> highly confusing. This instance has proven that.
so you think if it inserted itself with all the read messages, it'd be
less confusing? I know I'd never see it, now will anyone who reads
through the web interface...
> Besides, it is a disservice to the users to have their messages lag
> a month behind the intended date...think of it as a customer
> service issue.
naw - it's not the server's fault that whoever it is sat on the
authuntication for a month... The only way we could fix that on the
server side is to expire articles... say, if you don't auth it within a
week, it's thrown away. Is that a better solution? I'm not sure. it sure
will save space on the server though.
> This is a very rare occurance, but it is a known problem. Is there a
> solution?
return the auth message when you get it, or post via the web, and avoid
the auth problem.
Can you think of a better way of "fixing" this?
Dan
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) I like this suggestion. If the message isn't dispositioned within 5 days (I like 3 better) send the entire text of the message back to the sender via e-mail and remove it from the server. The message could easily be reposted via newsreader if (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) Maybe that's the penalty you mention below? Someone who doesn't authorize a message right away runs the risk of having their message being not read as it gets inserted in it's proper place in line-perhaps after a week or so? Is that even (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) It would help if the server could "nag" people if their auth response was never received. An e-mail reminder could help in case the original auth request was deleted or never delivered. I've always wondered ever since the auth system was put (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) That would only be true if the message somehow just showed up where it belonged in line. If it posts as a new message 28 days later, it is highly confusing. This instance has proven that. Besides, it is a disservice to the users to have their (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
83 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
