Subject:
|
Re: Posting Dates
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:40:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1931 times
|
| |
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Gerber wrote:
> > Besides, it is a disservice to the users to have their messages lag
> > a month behind the intended date...think of it as a customer
> > service issue.
>
> naw - it's not the server's fault that whoever it is sat on the
> authuntication for a month... The only way we could fix that on the
> server side is to expire articles... say, if you don't auth it within a
> week, it's thrown away. Is that a better solution? I'm not sure. it sure
> will save space on the server though.
It would help if the server could "nag" people if their auth response
was never received. An e-mail reminder could help in case the
original auth request was deleted or never delivered. I've always
wondered ever since the auth system was put in place how I could know
if I never replied to an auth request...
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) so you think if it inserted itself with all the read messages, it'd be less confusing? I know I'd never see it, now will anyone who reads through the web interface... (...) naw - it's not the server's fault that whoever it is sat on the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
83 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
