| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Doucette writes:
> In lugnet.people, Matthew Gerber writes:
> > [OK...I'm going to keep my cool here, and not attack Scott, despite my
> > sensabilities crying out for lots of sarcasm, exclamation points and capital
> > letters. I'm just going to point out a couple of facts and leave it at that.
> > I suggest that anyone following this thread or this post NOT reply to either
> > it or Scott's last message. Let this stand and let the thread die.]
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > You have just dug up a month old thread.
>
> It looks like you both did. Scott's message is dated 1-Feb, a couple of
> days following the previous message, although it showed up some 8 hours ago.
> If I look at the dates, you're the one holding the shovel.
>
> I thought this NNTP date posted/approved thing was corrected.
Indeed! My most abject apologies Scott. Had I caught that error in the
posting scheme, I would never have responded as I did! Again, my apologies!
Thank you Rob, for catching that mistake.
Admins: What is the deal with this? Is it a function of the e-mail message
release system, something in the NNTP services, the server itself, or what?
Althought chagrined, I'd like to see this corrected so that mistakes like
mine do not happen again to anyone else. Please inform us of a resolution
when possible.
Matt
(FUT: lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
83 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
