 | | Re: Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
(...) Alternately, could the highlight textual icons be added to the 'brief' message list display? It wouldn't be a search, but at least you could see at a glance which messages got tagged. Steve (25 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: See Me
|
|
<snip> (...) I tried it, and it works great!!! here is my member page, it is URL 3, labelled, "What I look like" I don't know if that's what some had in mind, of course those that have 3 URL's already linked, they are out of luck!! :( Benjamin (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Commercial?
|
|
Isn't this: (URL) commercial announcement? Is it allowed in lugnet.announce and lugnet.trains? (I know, we still need a ruling on market posts in theme groups... but the announce thing is pretty clear). A similar thing happened before, here: (URL) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: See Me
|
|
(...) that would probably have to be up to Todd to come up with... it probably wouldn't be that hard to do, but a minor update to the overall design layout of the membership page... Benjamin Medinets ...yes that would be very neat....two (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: See Me
|
|
Ross Crawford wrote in message ... (...) That would be *very* neat, especially if the pics came up on the member page rather than just linked (like on the BrickLink member page). Even better if there was 2 pics... one your minifig self and one for a (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: See Me
|
|
(...) Rosco, there is... go to the URL section of the member page ... in edit mode ... and hot-link it directly to the brickshelf photo.... or if you decide to add some color commentary :) you can use a ftx file (on lugnet, with your paid (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: See Me
|
|
(...) :-) (...) What if there was a way to add a link to a photo of yourself on your Lugnet member page? That'd be neat! ROSCO (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
(...) Okay, thanks. Keep us informed of any "Advanced Search" updates! TJ (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
(...) I haven't really looked into it yet, but from what I know, the index that is used just indexes the article data, and the author's name/email. The '(details)' you see will not show up anyway, since it's not part of the article at all - it's (...) (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
(...) Well, can the spotlight page ((URL) be modified so that you can look back more than 14 days? Or could it be modified so that you could search a particular time span (e.g. March 1, 2000 to May 1, 2000)? I did try searching in NEWS for (...) (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
(...) AFAIK, it cannot be done yet. Another thing to add to the 'Advanced Search' feature. One day, we'll have such a thing :) Dan (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
How would I go about searching for old messages in a specific group that have been highlighted or spotlighted by members? For example, I want to find all the h/s'd posts in .technic in the past 2 years. How can this be done? thanks, TJ (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
(...) in that case, you might want to sign up to one of the spam filtering services? I know some people have used them with much success, such as spamcop.net. (...) you can have as many setups as you need - but to use the spamblock, you only need (...) (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> (...) is (...) change (...) post, (...) Oh, I see. I have actually changed my posting setup to include the block, but cannot send e-mail out using the block, as my mail server will not (...) (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
(...) that is correct - since you didn't change your "from" field to use the spamblock. What you need to do is create a new "posting setup" here: (URL) put in your spamblock email address in the "From" area. Then, change your mail client to send (...) (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> (...) to (...) Dan, Question regarding this. I mostly post to LUGNET via e-mail. I just tried doing so using a spamblock in my reply-to header. This works fine, but my From: field still (...) (25 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
(...) are there some measure in place? yes, some. Is it possible to block out crawlers? not really. As long as anyone can point their browser (or newsreader) and connect to LUGNET, without requiring a password, the data there can be harvested. We (...) (25 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
I've been getting a lot of these - but only to a defunct address that never posted on LUGNET before... (...) (25 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) There is no formal proceedure, Shiri. -Suz (25 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) So, just to clarify - if I were to suggest my curatorship, I would do so first *within* lugnet.castle.org.cw? (as an example...) And then *if* I were approved by the posters in the group, I would email you? Or maybe I'm getting this all wrong. (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
"Kevin Wilson" <kwilson_tccs@compuserve.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GqtyyH.6A3@lugnet.com... (...) Nope, both debtreduction and asian-language are dropping in on my mail, in the order of 2-4 each day. This started suddenly (after Christmas?), and (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with change of email address and server authentication
|
|
Just replying to my own post. "Paul Baulch" <paul@vic.bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:Gqq88G.Aps@lugnet.com... (...) It's all sorted out now - the confirmation email arrived after ten or eleven days. Not a complaint - more of an FYI to anyone (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:Gqtw8r.KzB@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) I used to get their spam, and I forget if I added a filter against them or if I finally bugged them enough to remove me. Its pretty sad when a (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
Mr L F Braun wrote in message ... (...) I've been getting lots and lots of debt0reduction spams but not much in the way of cell-phones. Also lots of asian-language spam, but I blame that on our (VLC's) and my appeareance in a chinese-language (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
(...) Are you still getting the Edventures mail? Because they seem to have gone more places than just LUGNET, I was getting their spam at all of the BricksWest addresses (which I don't use to post anywhere, though they may be mentioned in the body (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
Hi, I just wanted to ask if there's any evidence we've been visited by a spambot lately--suddenly there's been an enormous spike in spam (two or three a day, up from one every six months) to my .msu.edu account, which I *only* use to post here and (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RFC2047 encoded headers
|
|
RFC2047 is the standard way to encode non 7-bit characters in header fields since 1996. Headers which are not decoded look ugly, to say the least. Here are some examples: (URL) (Subject line) (URL) (From line) (URL) (From line) (URL) (Subject line) (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) Thanks for that clarification. When I posted that I had *completely forgotten* that admin.curators had been set up and I forgot to check, to boot. (25 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) Ideally, I like to see discussion amongst interested parties happen within the group in question. That is, assuming there's discussion about who will curate. Request messages sent to me privately would be appreciated. A post to admin.curators (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) Ok, I found the box! I'll try to get these out. -Suz donations of postage stamps welcome.. Suzanne Rich 101 Village Farm Road Columbia, SC 29223 (25 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Please change the BrickBay refs to BrickLink
|
|
Now that Dan has renamed BrickBay to BrickLink, please change the BrickBay references to read BrickLink. There are two that I noticed in a quick scan, one is on the web page for /market/buy-sell-trade and the other is in the heading text for (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "I done it again..." - Sir Robin, Monty Python and the Holy Grail (Re: "It's not my fault!")
|
|
(...) Well, I just noticed these 3 posts: (URL) posted the 6784 version, but it was while slashdot was still having an effect, and got the "server unavailable" message. I wasn't sure if it posted, so I added a few words, and posted again, the 6785 (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "I done it again..." - Sir Robin, Monty Python and the Holy Grail (Re: "It's not my fault!")
|
|
(...) Yeah, actually, I DID preview these, but only edited the second pair before posting...but I do that often enough without it posting twice, and these messages had the same content in each pair, not the original and edited versions... Matt (25 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "I done it again..." - Sir Robin, Monty Python and the Holy Grail (Re: "It's not my fault!")
|
|
(...) trying to find this in the logs, I can clearly see multiple POST requests from the webserver from you. This, on it's own, doesn't mean much. Do you "preview" before you post? did you change anything in those messages, and then repost? LMK Dan (25 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | "I done it again..." - Sir Robin, Monty Python and the Holy Grail (Re: "It's not my fault!")
|
|
(...) Same thing just happened again! Only seems to be happening to me (right now)... (URL) I doing something wrong? Is this a cookie issue? Should I log out and back in again? Matt (25 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problem with change of email address and server authentication
|
|
Hi, My email address changed a while ago, and although the old one is still valid it has a more limited life span, hence I wish to change my server posting details. I went to: (URL) changed my email addy. It said to wait until I recieve a (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | "It's not my fault!" - Han Solo, Star Wars
|
|
Admin gang, I've never seen this happen before, and wonder if you know what's happened. I posted a reply to a message, and it showed up twice, as two different messages. (URL) was using the web interface, and just typed the message and clicked (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Vendettas (was Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...)
|
|
(...) I think mine fit in .people...whatever... Matt (25 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Vendettas (was Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...)
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GqpspD.Kq4@lugnet.com... (...) My bad... I followed Matt's lead yesterday though. ;-) I'll fut all of my replies away from .people and to .debate. -Tim (25 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Vendettas (was Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...)
|
|
(...) I'd argue that this is an admin issue if it belongs anywhere on LUGNET(tm) at all. (which I doubt, at this point, that it does) It's a stretch to see how this fits the lugnet.people charter: lugnet.people– All about LEGO® people (enthusiasts, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: followups in Outlook
|
|
Duh! Thanks - Stupid me :) -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:Gqp61J.Dzs@lugnet.com... (...) I'm (...) resorting (...) I'm (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: followups in Outlook
|
|
After you press "reply to group", go to "view" on the message window menu and select "all haeders". I have version 6. Good luck Scott A "James Stacey" <james@minifig.co.uk> wrote in message news:<Gqp4oH.B3L@lugnet.com>... (...) set (...) to (...) to (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | followups in Outlook
|
|
With everyone keen on keeping the right post in the right place (which I'm all for) I'll have to admit to getting a bit lost. Is there any way in Outlook to set a followup to a specific group? I can XPost fine but not set a followup Outlook (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) You are correct. Analogous to another relatively recent admin.general discussion, if you don't reply publicly to the effect, no one knows you did what you did, and we are left to assume that the issue is left unchecked. If you want to admonish (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) If I called up someone on the phone and said, "Hey friend, I think that was a little over-the-top" I don't think you would know. If we, at one of our monthly meetings brought up the faux pas that was posted in the newsgroup--again, I don't (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney writes: <snip> (...) <snip> It is relevant to post the original post in .general, but it should be followed up in .market.brickshops. I do not have a problem with cross posting this kind of thing for interest's (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GqMrtn.4t1@lugnet.com... (...) discussion (...) community (...) I gotta agree with Matt here. This is something of interest to everyone who uses BrickBay - and not eveyrone visits (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
(...) Not true...I've only used Brickbay once (a very good experience, I've just not needed anything else)...I never go there normally. I happen to think that the issue is important to the community in general (no pun intended), so I added .general (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
Matthew Gerber wrote in message ... (...) community (...) Nope, it's only of interest to people who buy Lego off Brickbay. Not everyone does, and even if they did, the appropriate area for the discussion is in the .market heirarchy or on the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
(...) Or is that (now moved...again) thread of "general" interest to the community at large? A lot like the .announce argument (now mostly solved), .general reaches a broad audience, and is a good starting place to get to a large number of folks and (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
Is anyone else as bothered by me about lugnet.general appearing to be used as a "I'm not a Compartmentalized Dork so I'm going to not use appropriate newsgroups" place? We've got a raging discussion about use of "bay" going on, plus just so many (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) Or would directing this stuff to the right group help a bit? Matt FUT lugnet.admin.curators 8?) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I understand that each subcommunity is different. I'm not for strict adherence to the exact same set-in-stone standards for every obscure group on LUGNET. At the same time, each group should be mature and good-natured enough to practice (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) Well, even though I volunteered publicly, and even though I think you'd make a fine curator for either or both group hierarchies, I'm thinking now, on second thought that it may be more appropriate to send notes to the Admins (for volunteering (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | .market Curators
|
|
(...) to (...) I would be willing to be curator for a few .market groups. When I read Lugnet daily, the first places I always look are the .market groups. I am very comfortable there and I think I have a very good perspective of what is needed and (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I can't think of a single currently active participant who remotely seems to go out of his or her way to police newsgroups. And the only person I can think of at all who may have had the appearance of policing was just trying to be helpful. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Me either. As I said in my first email to David (perhaps using a not very good analogy didn't make that point very clear, admittedly). (...) Me too, me either. (...) I did but it didn't address that point. I may have been unclear but as I said (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
"David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:GqIEps.3H6@lugnet.com... (...) over. If that's what you think of the people (including myself) who are doing the policing, you don't know us well enough. I certainly don't scour LUGNET (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
David Koudys wrote in message ... (...) of (...) all (...) Disclaimer: I am not in any way an admin, just a concerned community member. Anyone who posts on LUGNET agreed to the TOS when they signed up. From the TOS ((URL) not) Post or transmit any (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
Hmm, I was trying to get myself out of this discussion... I for the most part would like to see the same picture David espouses. The problem that I see is that when people make these little "nudges", the "offender" takes offense and yells "why are (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess writes: <Snip> (...) Wow, that cleaned up pretty good! Let's cut to the end of the tape... Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) is not a good thing. I'll tell you why: First thing-no names please--whatever (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) "test with name" fails on both IE 5.0 passing to Outlook 2000 and on IE 5.0 passing to Outlook 98. It appears the format failure is the "Joe Blow" part of the link. HTH James (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Is there a chance to get the names removed from the pages? I was talking to a web guy here at work and he says the fault lies in the hyperlink. In order to be compatible with as much software as possible the hyperlink should use only the email (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
(...) I agree (...) Does the market hierarchy HAVE a curator yet? How does one tell if it does or not, if the curator hasn't put their name at the bottom? (I checked and did not see it at the root or in .shopping, didn't check them all) .trains (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Non ISO charaters (was Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there i
|
|
(...) This is an RFC2047 encoded header, which is the preferred way to transfer 8-bit characters in header fields. RFC2047 dates to 1996, and should be implemented in most user agents. It has not been implemented in the LUGNET web interface? It is (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) So what you're asserting is that LUGNET isn't in conformance to spec but that it works for some mailers because their implementation isn't as spec-picky? The thought of an MS product being better at spec conformance is shocking. Until you (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Non ISO charaters (was Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there i
|
|
(...) Hee-hee...no offense taken! I understand, 'cuz here's what your mail link looks like on my Macintosh: Fredrik =?iso-8859-1?q?Gl=F6ckner?= <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> (...) I'm web interface, and of course, it looks just fine to me posting or (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Non ISO charaters (was Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market))
|
|
(...) I've been addressing this issue before, but I think it is about time to pick it up again. Matthew, I'm using your article as an example, no offence! I frequently see the use of characters which are not in the ISO 8859-1 character set on (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 06:30:36 GMT, "Kevin Salm" <kdsalm@crosswinds.net> wrote: <snippage-before and after> (...) Kevin, you appear to be using the web interface so I cannot really say if it's possible to what I do (I use a newsreader for lugnet). (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Scott (et al.), First, see this post, in response to a very polite and non-confrontational questioning of Larry, and the other GoB members, about the whats, whys and wherefors of establishing , asserting and maintaining a trademark: (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) ...and that bolsters MY point. Unless you are willing honour every single trademark you mention here, you are in absolutely no position to chastise others for not doing so. Doing so would be sheer hypocrisy. Do you fail to see that? Further, (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
(...) So, Scott, why do you point this stuff out ??? (Please DO NOT answer) Often there is no real purpose in such replies. I cannot know why you feel you need to respond to bad posts by others and to continue rants and mud slinging--and I don't (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I see the same behaviour Jude does in my instance of O2K so I did want to give it a whirl for you. Strangely enough, BrickBay has now started successfully generating filled out subject lines. I think the format there is like this: (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Don't tell me Uncle Bill broke LUGNET!?! Jude (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I tried making Outlook Express as my default Mail and it has no problems. So the problem is with the config of Outlook 2K. Does anybody else use Outlook 2K for email and IE 5.5? If so, do you have this problem? (...) Good, I am glad I was (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) ok, how about these then? (URL) BTW, Should I have posted this to .admin.general instead of .faq? well, depending what the question is. If it's how to get outlook to work, then it's either a faq or a geek question... if it's why is the LUGNET (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Both work without any problems. Jude BTW, Should I have posted this to .admin.general instead of .faq? (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I wonder if it's haveing a problem with the subject definition in the link? try the two links here, tell me if any of those work, or both, or none: (URL) lugnet.admin.general (25 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Hi Scott, Please refrain from quoting the entire post to reply to a single paragraph. If people want more context, they can always read the previous posts. Thanks ROSCO (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) That assumes you know my motive or decision process for deciding when, and whom, to remind. Which you do not. (...) No, actually it bolsters MY point which is that not every instance needs to be reminded and that some allowance for error and (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I tried to find a good place farther down the thread to tack this on, but I couldn't; it's wandered too far from the point here. Tim's point (and Larry's point, and Frank's point, and Dan's point, and several other people's point) is that (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Against better judgement, I am adding another comment to this string. Larry, you made a 'friendly reminder' for mis-using your trademarked name (by assertion), yet, here is someone that mis-used your trademarked name twice! But, because he is (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) well the thread is over, but I don't think Allan will be here to rehash it in his way...he's decided to stick to his "reviews". (...) What kind of Bull is that Lar??? I didn't label it "LAr's thread". I only merely used that as an example of (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) What I think is hilarious (in a sad way) is that (I'm apparently such a lightning rod that?) any conversation that I participate seems to get branded, by people that ought to know better, as my thread. I didn't start that particular thread. I (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) rrr...rrring! Wake-up. Smell the coffee. That has not been my stance for some time now. ;) (...) Exactly! Respect is a two way street. If users have no respect for the policeman (as you suggest with LP) how can they have respect for his/her (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Now *you* are missing the point. (...) I would say it is both. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) So you think it’s OK to be blatantly hypocritical? You think it is OK for him to exhibit double standards? Are those community values we should all demonstrate? Scott A (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) An interesting description. I challenge you to look at all my posts over the last couple of months outside this group and look at the amount of “thorning” I have generated. Compare that to your own, and that of your vigilante mate’s. I know I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) That is your view. But I have also noticed that you have the ability to |start arguments here. Do you disagree with that? It's a hunch, but I am pretty sure that you have been involved in more bickering than I have over the past couple of (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) That is your view. But I have also noticed that you have the ability to start arguments here. Do you disagree with that? (...) Read the message and its reply. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
"Benjamin Medinets" <bmedinets@excite.com> wrote in message news:GqF2E7.CGx@lugnet.com... (...) I have a low tolerance level for Scott's posts, given that he tends to repeat the same drivel over and over again. (...) snipe (...) I (...) the (...) in (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) if that makes you sick, then you really, truly have a very low tolerance level...and I am not trying to be funny. (...) GOB is a trademark of their perspective properties, however, I do think they (Lar and all) do go a bit too much to try and (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Search option
|
|
(...) X-posted to .admin.general with a "Me too!" attached. (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) No. But I have to give credit at least for an effort. I give more credence and respect to those who contribute but I view an effort as noteworthy none-the-less. (...) I didn't see anything disrespectful in the way that Larry made his (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) But does blunt arrogance make Lugnet a better place? (...) No one is saying that. Where Larry was wrong was to ask for respect, when he was failing to do so for others – respect is a two way street. It was 1st rate hypocrisy. Nothing less. It (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
Newsgroups: lugnet.admin.general Path: lugnet From: "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> X-Real-Life-Name: Scott Arthur Subject: Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
I was going to reply to Kyle directly, but Frank, you gave me a better springboard. :-) "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3C4E370A.6D598D...ing.com... (...) LUGNET (...) of (...) Exactly, I agree. The sentiment 'lets make (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM)
|
|
Frank did an excellent job of addressing most of the points you raised in your post. There was one loose end though... In lugnet.admin.general, Kyle Beatty wrote much that Larry snipped: (...) I am assuming this example is what you refer to here in (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3C4E2C1D.E72B2C...ing.com... (...) that (...) Ohh... thought you were getting after me :-) Doh! (...) No problem. (...) I wish you the best, hopefully its not the worst case scenario that's (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
