To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 7760
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Heheh..When I saw the first of the films in theater (it was 1979 I think) all the characters had subtitles and all of them speaking a language that I had no idea about at that time..:-) you know, I was only 7-8 years old at that time..:-) (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  A couple stupid SW questions...
 
No flames please = ) I consider myself a SW fan, but by no means do I know as much as many of you... What is the purpose of the B-wing and A-wing? (vs. the X-wing and Y-wing) I realize the x-wing is a mainline fighter and the Y-wing is a (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) you... (...) The B-wing is suppossed to have enough fire power to take on a Star Destroyer. More of a "heavy" fighter I guess. The A-wing on the other hand is a highly agile and fast fighter, much like an interceptor. The military has specific (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Basically the Y-wing is an old fighter/bomber that by the end of the trilogy was pretty much past its useful service. The A-wing is a very fast but not very powerful fighter. Because of its speed it is better at fighting Tie-interceptors in (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) you... (...) My understanding was that the B-Wing was the heavy, heavy, heavy duty fighter that could take a lot of damage from fighters and take on up to smallish capital size ships in combat. The A-Wing was the hit and run type fighter or (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) I'll try not to... no promises tho... :) (...) you... (...) It depends on how you mean... if you mean as actual ships, the B-Wing is a heavily armed figher/bomber and the A-Wing is a lightly armed reconasaince ship. The A-Wing is supposedly (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Ouch, I would have to disagree with you on that last one. The B-wing is no where near as fast or agile as a Tie Advanced, but it does carry way more armor and weapons. TIE Advanced were one of the latest developments in the TIE series and were (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) you... (...) The A wing was introduced for recon, escort, and interceptor purposes as well as for quick raids. It has shields and a hyperdrive two lasers and a pair of concussion missle launchers. Y wing is an old outdated bomber which was (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) But...Vader's TIE did have hyperdrive and it was the only advanced model that we see in the original trilogy. Have fun building, Travis (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
If I remember correctly, they included the shields and a more robust life support system to the Tie Advanced to make them, and the pilots last longer. This was the second coming of the empire, and it was a much poorer empire at that point, so they (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Amendment: Astromech Droids are able to carry 10 preprogrammed hyperdrive routes in memory, and can recalculate for new jumps with some ease and a little time. Rebel hyperdrive equiped fighters not using Astromechs or sophisticated computers (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) So you can tell which movie you're watching. ;) (...) Wheels are for droids, man. Steve (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) And Gungans. It's cool, though, that Speeder Bikes are called Bikes, since bike is of course an abbreviation for bicycle, implying that wheeled conveyances were in use prior to repulsor technology. That, or perhaps the engine is two-cycled! (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Um... The Star Wars Roleplaying Game and Sourcebook is not considered canon matieral. (Canon material means it is "real" in the Universe so is one step above "Offical" material.) The order of canon is in order of most important in the event of (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Hey I've never seen an E-Wing. Could someone link me to a pic? =) -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) What's the name of this SW encyclopedia? It sounds great and I'll probably order it. -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) in (...) false (...) and (...) by (...) computer (...) Star Wars Encyclopedia is the title. It sounds great and I'll probably order (...) Any major Book store should have it. I think it is about $30 but it is also about 3cm thick. Just rember (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
Look for it on the Star Wars 3D Modeling Alliance, (URL) a direct link to an E-Wing pic on SWMA: (URL) is a great source for renderings of SW ships. They have many different ships, including the E-Wing and even the V-Wing. I personally don't like (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
Go to: (URL) pic, but info on the E-Wing Adam (...) fighter (...) or (...) as (...) the (...) some (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) in (...) WORTHLESS!?! Excuse me, but most all of it makes more sense than gas from beans :> I don't care how "Lucas" it is, it is just a helpful and usefull sorce of information that makes my teenie brain say, " Ah, how simple." Many books (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Hold your breath... The TIE Advanced is also considered a design study, looking into the maximum potiential of the TIE design. The wing of a TIE is a solar power collector, the bent design allows for greater coverage, and increased visibility (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) It's really quite simple, John. Kids love Star Wars and parents have to buy toys that kids love. But if a kid already has the X-wing and Y-wing, then when the new movies come out, you can't slow down the merchandising. Thus, the A and B wing (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Dark Empire: E-Wing and V-Wing were exposed! Funny, every major character in the SW Universe speaks English!!! I think is smells of a conspiracy... Aaron ;~) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) character in (...) Nah, they speak "Basic." ;^) ~Mark (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) of (...) is (...) false (...) by (...) Oh for crying out loud. What I stated was the offical standpoint of Lucasfilm/Lucasarts. All it states is that if their is an argument information form any game is worthless as it is overridden by offical (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
That's what I've always enjoyed about Star Trek. They boldly go where no man has gone before and when they get there they discover without surprise... that they all speak English. At least Jabba and Greedo had subtitles. (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
We-elll they technically have "universal translators." They even talk about it in ST:VI when they're at the Klingon trial. ~Mark (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Star (...) and (...) computer (...) goof- (...) Good (...) information (...) Have they stated anything to contradict the Sourcebook information I added to discussion, or does it merely not get in the way of "canon"? If it does, please point (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
In Battlestar Gallactica they use "Languatron" devices that actually allow you to hear spoken alien words (like our "real-world"[whatever that is] news interviews) followed by English (or whatever them children of the stars call it). That seems most (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) -Maybe they have babelfish. (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
[snip] (...) step (...) important (...) [snip] (...) Well the sourcebook is contradictory to many things that are canon so I don't put much stock in it. However anything that is explained in it with no other explaination, could and arguably should (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) What about Chewbacca? Although, I must admit, Chewie speaks better English than some of my co- workers. Jeff J (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) He is cleverly pushed aside by the commie (not that there is anything wrong with that) Rebels, and never receives praise or a medal for his hard labor. I think that the Rebels have a Glass Ceiling of their own. Poor old Ackbar has to put (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) It's always bothered me that Chewie didn't get a medal placed around his neck by the Princess. He risked his his life also. What's up with that!? (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) This one has been debated repeatedly ever since the movie origionally came out. I personally think he should have received a medal and I can't really give you a good answer as to why he didn't. Whether intendid or not there have been racial (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) out. (...) The only "good" excuse (and I use good lightly) I've heard was that it was "undignified" for the Princess of alderann to get up on a chair to present Chewie his medal (due to his hight) and he recieved it at the party afterwards in (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Ah...the venerable & eternal SW race card debate. I don't think that Lucas meant any harm by drawing on the stereotypes; that is, I don't think that there was any malicious intent. I realize that many folks will say that the Nemoidians didn't (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) neck (...) you (...) Bleah. I learned a technique in English class this year called "Willful suspension of disbelief." All that it says is not to be critical of the novel you're reading or movie you're watching, etc, or you will not enjoy it (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Hey, for all we know Chewie had some cultural or religious proscription against the wearing of anything other than that bandolier/sash thing that he wears. W- (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
While Chewie may not have gotten a medal, at least he got to stand on the stage with Han and Luke. If I remember correctly the only other survivors of the attack on the Death Star were one Y-wing and one X-wing fighter. After suffering about 90% (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Maybe gold medals give Wookie gonads a nasty rash... Aaron (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
Please, Lucas, don't (...) AMEN! Not that he ain't creative, but some people should stick to what they have talent at. Directing ain't it Lucas. Aaron (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) wrong (...) labor. (...) present (...) afterwards (...) was (...) had thought! WE are all communicating in written English!!!!! Oh, no. I too am a part of this plot to subvert the known universe to English! It is certainly possible that Chewie (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) stage (...) Well, wouldn't they have to slignshot around the Sun? I don't think Han and Luke have actually been anywhere near Earth (sector 001), so there ain't a snowball's chance in you-know-where of the MF ever pulling that stunt. Besides, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) by (...) I want to say I remember the novel mentioning that Chewie got his later because nobody could reach over his head to place it around his neck. It's not just Carrie Fisher that would be at a disadvantage. I'm 5'10" and I can't reach and (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) I remain skeptical. Chewie could have kneeled or bowed low. It was careless to put Chewie in the scene (particularly since the whole audience knows that he deserves to be honored), and then fail to adequately recognize his bravery. Lucas gets (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) In addition, both Luke and Han bowed somewhat accomodate Leia's reach, so a deeper bow from Chewie wouldn't have been out of place. Does the fact that he was First Mate rather than Captain have anything to do with it? Just a thought, though he (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) hmmm... and how many movies have you directed? Quit calling the kettle black until you become a pan... or something like that... :) When you make your millions from an excellent series of sci fi movies come back and we'll talk. Otherwise, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Perhaps for some reason Chewbacca declined a medal? If he felt that he was merely performing part of his life-debt to Han, for example, he might well have said "no thanks" to receiving an award. eric (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) You may not have offended him, but you've managed to get me miffed. I happen to be a fan of both Star Wars *and* Babylon 5, and I don't see how the two are mutually exclusive. eric (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) I'd like to speak with your teacher, because that's not what suspension of disbelief is about at all. Suspension of disbelief entails an overlooking of improbable or impossible elements of a story so that, incorporating those elements, the (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) I read that the Nemoidians were criticized for sounding too "middle eastern," which I didn't perceive at all. From the first time I heard JarJar, though, I couldn't help seeing decades-old stereotypes of the finest step-and- (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Besides which, the whole issue depends on suspension of disbelief (see, Greg--that's how it works!) Obviously aliens wouldn't speak English, but are you really interested in watching a show in which 58 minutes of each episode are devoted to (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) I think it's actually about $50, if it's the one I saw over the weekend. Dave! (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) I think you must have missed but that dog has been roundly critisized by the Mexican American community. They have repeatedly asked for the adds to be pulled and Taco Bell keeps coming back with some other lame excuse as to why the dog is not (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) In fact, I *had* missed that, but I'm glad to hear it. Thanks for enlightening me! Dave! (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) True. From personal experience, people in real-life prefer to talk in their native toungue if they know that the person will understand them. I've seen lots of families in which the parents constantly speak to their kids in one language, and (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Has no one ever heard of a bow? Chewie bends over a bit, the princess stretches, and the medal is bestowed. Oh, well. The scene more-or-less worked the way it was intended. Lucas never did understand the dynamics of the little group of (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) stereotypical (...) Eh, if I can butt in here... There have been complaints over Dinky (let's use the poor little guy's name, here), but they have been rebuffed not only by Taco Bell but by the NAALP (National Association for the Advancement (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) I always marvel when I see that happen--I hate to seem like a rube, but that sort of mental gear-shifting stuns me! Dave! (who speaks enough Spanish to say "I don't speak Spanish!) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) No problem, If you want to learn more heres a link to an artical on the contriversy. (URL) Kingsley The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) My Creations at: (URL) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) ***snip*** (...) Ahh, so with all of the suns in the universe, time travel is only possible by going around the Earth's Sun ;) As beat up as the MF is I thing that Klingon Bird of Prey was in worse shape. Matt (who likes most things sci-fi and (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Shiri is right. Here in Canada we are a bilingual country (well, really only parts are). My skills in speaking in french have only really developed in the last few years but my understanding has always been strong. I remember in high school (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Actually, IMO its easier to communicate that way than for one person to switch over entirely. I understand Flemish (Dutch) and Spanish much better than I can speak them, so if the person I'm talking to speaks English well enough, I may very (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Exactly. It doesn't happen in my family much 'coz we're all better in hebrew, but my parents' friends' and their kids often switch languages, for example when the mom talks Hebrew to the kids (her native language) and the kids, who've lived in (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Yeah I heard this talking cat speak English on this commercial! How stereotypical! =P -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) I didn't mean to insult Babylon 5 fans either! I was merely using it as an "alternative." I could have used any SCI-FI movie or series, B5 was the first to pop into my head. IMO people who criticize the SW movies come off like non-SW fan... I (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Babylon 5 (was Re: A couple stupid SW questions...)
 
(...) Heh. S'ok. I was mostly kidding. (...) Err. I saw a nanofig Narn fighter as well. That's about it. There have been several ships "based on" the Starfury, though I can't remember the URLs offhand. I've changed the subject and set a follow-up to (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
I was bilingual from the start so a few things happened. Spanish and English do not seem like separate languages to me. Instead it's like having two vocabulary sets. I think in either. Sometimes they mix but I usually speak whichever language is (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Well, I'm not offended...I chose to join the fray, thus I'll take my licks like a big boy. That said... Lucas is not just a misunderstood artist who is receiving unsolicited criticism from the masses; he is an entrepreneur (albeit an artist as (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Maybe the tradition in that far, far away galaxy is that only the ship commanders get a medal, the honour, though, goes to the entire crew, which is why there were all up there on the platform. -- David Schilling (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) bravery. (...) the (...) I enjoy the movie, but I also like to nit-pick. Is there some kind of help group available for me or can I just go on annoying people with my nagging? Personally, I think Leia just wanted to show off her cleavage (what (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) are (...) Seems to me that those of us who have been the most critical have been the biggest fans of Lucas' work. Star Wars has practially been a religion for me since I was four. Because I spend so much time in the Star Wars universe, I (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) are (...) Did someone not post only a few messages ago that if you don't want to talk positive about Star Wars that you should go and find a B5 discussion? Let's all play well now and not get high and mighty on others and then pull exactly the (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) That's why the Romulans never went back in time to kick Kirk's butt. (...) I am currently working up a model in LEGO of a PB and pickle sandwich (dill) and submitting it first to Lucas' ship design team (hope he likes it) and then if he (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) careless (...) the (...) it (...) Aye, Aaron, there is help. Go to www.nitpickers.com/movies. Pretty amazing...sort of. -Chris (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Don't misquote me... I didn't say that people who critique and discuss Star Wars are non-fans... I said IMO people who CRITICIZE the SW MOVIES come off like non-SW fans... in other words, people who spout negative comments about the SW movies (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) your (...) Same thing to me, why you chose to get huffy over movie critique escapes me. Movie critique is a right of every fan. What would be the point of fandom if you are only allowed conditions like these for discussion? You can only (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Uh... I ain't huffy... :) My mood remains as it has been. I'm fairly relaxed actually. (...) I didn't say that... again you're putting words in my mouth. I was merely stating that it's pointless to complain about things you can't change. Even (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Aaron (and we, in general) aren't complaining in the hope that George will re-do anything; we're complaining because George didn't do it as well as he might have, given certain differences of aesthetic sensibility. (...) I've heard lots of (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) I think the only thing this group is debating comes up to us "qualified experts (snicker)" grading a body of work which we have studied. We are a bunch of know-it-alls on Star Wars (my name is Aaron, and I'm a Star Wars addict). I just like to (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR