Subject:
|
Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:26:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1417 times
|
| |
|
|
[snip]
> > > > Um... The Star Wars Roleplaying Game and Sourcebook is not considered canon
> > > > matieral. (Canon material means it is "real" in the Universe so is one • step
> > > > above "Offical" material.) The order of canon is in order of most • important
> > > in
> > > > the event of a contradiction: Movies, Original Radio Dramas of movies,
> > > > Novelisations of Movies, Expanded Universe novels published by Bantam, and
> > > > Comics published by Dark Horse. Everything else is basically considered • false
> > > > and misinformation. Offical material is usually stuff like the Star Wars
> > > > Encyclopedia and the Behind the Magic CD. (offical means it is authorized • and
> > > > based on canon material.) Anything in an offical source is always overruled • by
> > > > a canon source. Everything else; Droids cartoon, and Star Wars game • computer
> > > > or otherwise, is basically worthless for getting stats out of.
> > > >
> > > > -Lord Insanity
[snip]
> Have they stated anything to contradict the Sourcebook information I added to
> discussion, or does it merely not get in the way of "canon"?
Well the sourcebook is contradictory to many things that are canon so I don't
put much stock in it. However anything that is explained in it with no other
explaination, could and arguably should be used untill/unless something canon
or offical comes along. Lucasfilm/Lucasarts offical standpoint is that the
sourcebook is little more than fan fiction though. (Kinda like Paramounts
attitude toward every Trek novel save 2 by one of the producers.)
> If it does,
> please point too where. I am sorry, but every time I enter a Star Wars debate
> somebody gets upset about what I write.
Yes I experience that quite a bit myself. So I fully understand your reaction.
> I supose it makes me tense... No
> offense taken and I hope not to offend you. I've taken a 10 second time out
> and feel better now :)
> Best wishes on recovering insanity (?),
:-)
> Aaron
-Lord Insanity
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
|
| (...) Star (...) and (...) computer (...) goof- (...) Good (...) information (...) Have they stated anything to contradict the Sourcebook information I added to discussion, or does it merely not get in the way of "canon"? If it does, please point (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
