Subject:
|
Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 May 2000 15:20:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
721 times
|
| |
|
|
That depends on your definition of POOP.
If you define it as Piece Of One Purpose, then it fits the bill... I was
defining it as such.
~Mark
In lugnet.starwars, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Mark Sandlin writes:
>
> > - I still don't like the single, huge POOP used for the cockpit canopy. I
> > think this could have been done better with a smaller POOP and a few
> > bricks. [ Cost: none - Isn't this a new piece? I think it could have been
> > done a LOT better... and with a standard 1x4 hinge]
>
> Please explain how you can make this Piece Out of Other Pieces. Use • the back
> of the paper if you need extra room.
>
> I don't think you actually can.
>
> eric
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
| BTW, I realize that I used a non-standard, or '"incorrect" definition, if you will. Perhaps I should have called it a PEWC... but that stands for Pre-fab Explorien Wing Cockpit... so only the Cockpit moniker applies. Anyone have a better acronym for (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
| (...) As others in this thread mentioned, your definition is actually a SPUD, which has many definitions but is often known as Single Purpose UnLEGOish Design. -Shiri P.S. <plug> (URL) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
| (...) Please explain how you can make this Piece Out of Other Pieces. Use the back of the paper if you need extra room. I don't think you actually can. eric (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
