To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.piratesOpen lugnet.pirates in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Pirates / 2746
2745  |  2747
Subject: 
Re: New legend is up
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.pirates
Followup-To: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:13:02 GMT
Viewed: 
49 times
  
In lugnet.general, David Eaton writes:
In lugnet.general, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.general, John Henry Kruer writes:
Common, Lego.  Give everybody an equel chance.

I could swear that's what they just did: there was a vote.  Blame the
public.

Well, I dunno if it was *quite* an equal chance. Let's say they instigate
another Legend vote and select as hopefuls:

- 6836  V-Wing Fighter
- 6399  Airport Shuttle
- 2539  Batwing Flyer
- 6256  Islander Catamaran

Now, a vote it may be, but even without putting up a poll, I think I could
predict the winner among these. And I wouldn't go blaming the public in the
event that 6399 won. A contest like that is as good as rigged.

Battrax wasn't really on the same level "Legend-wise" (I don't think) as the
other sets on the list. Had they picked the Galaxy Explorer, Intergalactic
Command Base, Galaxy Commander, Message Intercept Base, etc, then there
probably would've been more of a chance of a space set winning on sheer appeal.

DaveE

I'm sure part of the selection was because they wanted to include sets of
different sizes.  There also may be issues with production on the sets you
mention.  And let us further note that within Lugnet the Battrax is rated
92, the BSB 94, the Yellow Castle 92, Black Falcon's Castle 93, and Main
Street is rated 95.  All very close, all VERY highly rated.  You put up sets
rated 49, 65, 56, and 93.  With all due respect, I don't think your example
holds water.  Also note that those high (public) ratings undoubtedly helped
guide Lego in their selections, so it's still a case of blame the public.

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New legend is up
 
(...) Well, point of the example wasn't to say that it's the *same* as what was offered, but that just because there's a vote doesn't mean it's the voters' "fault". IE that it's possible for TLC to give certain nominees a better/worse chance of (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New legend is up
 
(...) Well, I dunno if it was *quite* an equal chance. Let's say they instigate another Legend vote and select as hopefuls: - 6836 V-Wing Fighter - 6399 Airport Shuttle - 2539 Batwing Flyer - 6256 Islander Catamaran Now, a vote it may be, but even (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.pirates)

87 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR