To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 37512
37511  |  37513
Subject: 
Re: New legend is up
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:13:25 GMT
Viewed: 
2429 times
  
In lugnet.general, David Eaton writes:
In lugnet.general, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:

I'm sure part of the selection was because they wanted to include sets of
different sizes.

Oh, definitely. And therein is another bag of worms. People tend to love big
sets more than little ones-- the classics that people remember as legends
tend to be large sets. Not as a rule, but usually. So that gives a bit of a
push for the other nominees.

The other thing about the larger sets is that we were probably less likely
to buy them when we were kids, but now we're adults with more cash to spend,
and we'd love to get that set we always wanted as a kid but couldn't afford.
I was a Classic Space kid, and I've got almost all of the small sets from
the late '70s, but I never got the Galaxy Explorer, Space Command Base, or
Beta-1 Command Base.

Bruce



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: New legend is up
 
(...) The only problem with this argument is that it makes the assumption that everyone buying a Legends set is an adult who missed buying it the first time 'round. I would suggest that perhaps a greater majority of buyers would be first-time (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
  Re: New legend is up
 
(...) Well if you had emailed in a bid for $90 you probably could have gotten the Beta-1 Command Base from that LEGO auction Sunday in Sacramento. Course, it's probably just as well you didn't-- I won it for $85 (which was $20 over my limit, but as (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.auction)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New legend is up
 
(...) Well, point of the example wasn't to say that it's the *same* as what was offered, but that just because there's a vote doesn't mean it's the voters' "fault". IE that it's possible for TLC to give certain nominees a better/worse chance of (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)

87 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR