| |
In lugnet.general, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.general, John Henry Kruer writes:
> > Common, Lego. Give everybody an equel chance.
>
> I could swear that's what they just did: there was a vote. Blame the
> public.
Well, I dunno if it was *quite* an equal chance. Let's say they instigate
another Legend vote and select as hopefuls:
- 6836 V-Wing Fighter
- 6399 Airport Shuttle
- 2539 Batwing Flyer
- 6256 Islander Catamaran
Now, a vote it may be, but even without putting up a poll, I think I could
predict the winner among these. And I wouldn't go blaming the public in the
event that 6399 won. A contest like that is as good as rigged.
Battrax wasn't really on the same level "Legend-wise" (I don't think) as the
other sets on the list. Had they picked the Galaxy Explorer, Intergalactic
Command Base, Galaxy Commander, Message Intercept Base, etc, then there
probably would've been more of a chance of a space set winning on sheer appeal.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New legend is up
|
| (...) I'm sure part of the selection was because they wanted to include sets of different sizes. There also may be issues with production on the sets you mention. And let us further note that within Lugnet the Battrax is rated 92, the BSB 94, the (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.pirates)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New legend is up
|
| (...) I could swear that's what they just did: there was a vote. Blame the public. Here's the most chosen reason for selecting the Barracuda by the voters: "Simply put the attention to detail in the Barracuda set the standard for Lego sets. It is (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.pirates)
|
87 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
