Subject:
|
Re: New legend is up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:16:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2165 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Benjamin Medinets writes:
> In lugnet.general, David Carriker writes:
> >
> > This still doesn't explain why we can by cypress tress in bulk, but they
> > weren't planning on including it in Main Street.
>
> This is still something that irritates me about the way they presented
> the Main Street. They go to the trouble of coming out with a bulk pack
> of Cypress trees, and then decide not to issue the part out with a
> prospective updated Main Street. I can see the reason for updating the
> track on the crane, but not the reason not to include the Cyphress tree.
The Legends vote started before the cypress tree was re-released. Obviously
(to my mind) they didn't know they would/could provide the trees when they
wrote the description for Main Street.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New legend is up
|
| (...) There was some discussion about not including cypress trees when the Legends vote started in April of 2002. The cypress trees had already been announced in November 2001. John (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New legend is up
|
| If I knew any better, I'd think that LEGO direct was trying to sway the vote from these two hallmark sets. You look at the rarity of these sets these days...and the costs of these sets on on-line marketplaces....well, that's my opinion anyways. I (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
87 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
