Subject:
|
Re: New legend is up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:22:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2526 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Richie Dulin writes:
> In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes:
>
> > Similarly,
> > http://guide.lugnet.com/set/371_3
> > Offers one of the classic LEGO planes in a set with only 115 pieces. I flew
> > this plane for hours as a kid.
>
> Certainly a nice set for its time, with some nice pieces for its time (after
> all, inverse slopes were still something of a novelty in 1976). But only a
> classic "for it's time".
>
> It's not hard to see how some part substitutions and a bit of redesign could
> yield a much better model. A thinner tail (not necessarily a one piece tail,
> but plates on the side, or using one studded 1x2's to make a one stud wide
> tail), a more tapered fuselage (with inverse low slopes perhaps), a more
> detailed nose/engine (as used in the Adventurers planes), tapered wings etc etc.
I think the set stands as a fine example of traditional LEGO building using
fairly standard bricks, slopes and plates. I wouldn't change a thing. :)
Of course, also remember, I was only offering this an an example of the
_type_ of smaller set that _might_ make a reissue candidate. I'm sure other
people could think of lots of other possibilities. I go off my own memories
and my own collection. There must be dozens of other less than 150 piece
sets that we could talk about in this vein.
Regards,
Allan B.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New legend is up
|
| (...) Indeed. But I think it's important to get a better handle on what's desirable and what is not. For me, anyway, if it's pre minifig era, it's not that interesting of a set. (regardless of whether it has slopes or inverse slopes or what have (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New legend is up
|
| (...) Certainly a nice set for its time, with some nice pieces for its time (after all, inverse slopes were still something of a novelty in 1976). But only a classic "for it's time". It's not hard to see how some part substitutions and a bit of (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
87 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
