Subject:
|
Re: New legend is up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:52:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2400 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Benjamin Medinets writes:
> Here is my choice...maybe not from the "earliest" days of space...ie the
> triple digit space sets (as opposed to the more later-traditional of the
> 68xx and 69xx space sets)...
>
> the 6930... http://guide.lugnet.com/set/6930
>
> though it might be difficult for LEGO direct to get the mold to produce the
> (moonrocks) baseplate.
The baseplate would be a problem, but I think the <part:4089> "Slope Brick 33 3
x 2 Inverted Hollow with Towball" would be even worse. Perhaps they could use
<part:4626> as a replacement?
The hinge (<part:3639>/<part:3640>) used in one of the vehicles couls also be
problematic. Those parts did appear in 1999 in <set:6455>, but perhaps they
were just using up those molds?
Lots of other parts would have to be substituted of course, such as the minifig
helmets and the <part:4081a> "Plate 1 x 1 with Clip Light" which has changed in
subtle ways (now <part:4081b>) since then.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New legend is up
|
| argue that the Space theme was at a disadvantage. (...) actual votes aside, and the actual placement, I still think Space fans got a raw deal all around. It is the smallest of the sets offered, and while not a space buff, I might be able to find (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
87 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
