Subject:
|
Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Apr 2000 03:47:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1133 times
|
| |
|
|
> > That's what left-liberals and Democrats paint all Republicans, and shame • on
> > Mccain for doing it. And you wonder why most Republicans didn't vote for
> > him.
>
> I certainly wonder that. He was there only chance of winning the • election.
> We'll be welcoming (or whatever) President Gore next year. Uggh.
I don't think so. We shall see. The polls still favor Bush, as far as I have
seen.
> Ummmm...not the McCain that I watched. Which leftist ideas do you mean?
Well, campaign finance is a HUGE one, for starters. I think the whols system
is gfarbage, and putting the government in more power to regulate it is just
totally foolish. I think there should be no limits on contributions, and
full disclosure on donors. He waffled on taxes, social security, etc. The
press also lifted him up to a god-like status, even though he is a
Republican. The press would also have more control of politics then they
already do, and for the most part, are the left/liberal mind. The refroms
Mccain wanted would have hurt Republican financing, which is both funny and
pathetic.
> > And he played
> > himself like an outsider in the realm of politics, when he wan't. Like • Larry
> > said, theya re all politicians, even Mccain.
>
> I think he tried and mostly succeeded in portraying himself as a • reform-minded
> candidate, not a political outsider. Everyone knows that he's a career
> politico.
Well, he didn't portary himself as a reformer, he tried to portray himself
as a outsider, when he isn't. Don't misunderstand, I really respect him, but
he would have gotten balsted just as GWB is now. It doesn't matter who got
it, because the votes in November will tell.
> > Well, if you are running for the nominiation of a party (Let's not get • into
> > the whole primary debate again) would you not agree that you would want a
> > nomination of the people in the party? Just a question... We shall see in
> > November.
> Normally, but really, it's a complex system and any way to get the votes • you
> need will work. It just didn't this time. Pitty.
Pitty? Putty? Silly-putty? : )
I think the independant voters thing is overblown, but we shall see.
Scott E. Sanburn
Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> http://www.aeieng.com
LEGO Page -> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/3372/legoindex.html
Coming Soon: The Sanburn Systems Company
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
58 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
