To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5226
5225  |  5227
Subject: 
Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 2 Apr 2000 16:38:35 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
354 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
Libertarianism is generally considered to be strongly toward the right
of the political spectrum.

Not by libertarians, it's not. We reject the one dimensional spectrum. You • need
at least two. See the quiz at www.lp.org, for example.

I have taken the quiz before, interesting diamond shape. However, (no
offense to Libertarians or to Larry) it reminds me of triangulation, in
which Clinton seemed to try to position himself. He was above either the
right or left:

                       Clinton
                     /               \
               Liberal      Conservative

Haha!  I like that one!  There is an essential truth to it.  But once again,
you are ascribing to Clinton what in truth many politicians are guilty of.

                       Bush
                      /     \
                 Liberal    Conservative

That's the picture GWB gave at the start of the campaign.  When challenged by
someone that rewrote it as:

                      McCain
                     /       \
               Liberal     Conservative
                                       \
                                       Dubya
                                       /
                                    Reactionary

Followed by Bush deciding that for the primaries at least he had best stick to
basics and gave out the following:

              McCain - liberal  conservative - Bush

This played well for republican voters, but the trick is getting the
independents to forget about it in November.

As to Libertarians, one can lean them left or right as one wishes.  The Orange
County Register plays great lip service to being Libertarian, but when push
comes to shove, they are staunchly conservative.  Talk show host Tom Leykis has
palmed himself off as a liberal at times, but is really a libertarian.  Lines
and circles really are too simplistic - I wonder if three-dimensional
representations are adequate.

Bruce



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
 
(...) Well I clearly think that a 2d is better than a 1d whether closed form or open... whether more than 2 dimensions are needed is unclear. But libertarians introduced more dimensions precisely because we don't FIT on a 1D... we're not modern (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
 
Bruce; (Big sigh, and away we go!) (...) again, (...) Well, Clinton was the master of it, it was a Dick Morris idea, btw, and it worked beautifully for him (The era of big government is over. HA!!!...!!!) (...) I don't think so, BTW. Anyway: (...) (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
 
(...) need (...) I have taken the quiz before, interesting diamond shape. However, (no offense to Libertarians or to Larry) it reminds me of triangulation, in which Clinton seemed to try to position himself. He was above either the right or left: (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

58 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR