To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 8875
8874  |  8876
Subject: 
Re: God(tm)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 03:23:43 GMT
Viewed: 
895 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Matthew Gerber writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Brendan Powell Smith writes:

...copyright infringement for using God(tm) without permission.

These words strike me as EXTREMELY funny...

But then again, what are the chances that some major religion
(Catholicism...I'm looking in your general direction!) uses this very >phrase
in possible litigation within the next 25 years or so?

Well, the religion Scientology (which, I state clearly and for the record,
is absolutely NOT a wacko fringe cult founded by a hack SF author for >the
sole purpose of bilking money out of the credulous, the desperate, or >the
mentally ill, nor is it a manipulative and exploitive pyramid scheme to
generate tax-free income at the expense of benighted aspirants) is >famed for
its litigiousness, and while "God" and "Christianity" might not be
copyrighted, "Scientology" and certainly "Dianetics" already are.  I grant
you, Scientology (though not at all an insane throng of duped cultists)
isn't a major religion in the sense that Christianity or Islam or Buddhism is...

    Dave!

The preceeding message has been forwarded to devout Scientologist John
Travolta. Let's all watch to see how long Dave continues to be 'Staying Alive'.

Sheesh! Trash-talking the same folks who brought you the finest cinematic
experience ever: Battlefield Earth! The gall of some people...

;-P

-Dave



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: God(tm)
 
(...) Alive'. Isn't Tom Cruise part of that bunch, too? ROSCO (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: God(tm)
 
(...) Well, the religion Scientology (which, I state clearly and for the record, is absolutely NOT a wacko fringe cult founded by a hack SF author for the sole purpose of bilking money out of the credulous, the desperate, or the mentally ill, nor is (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

80 Messages in This Thread:






























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR