Subject:
|
Re: LCD - LEGO Connection Database - Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:57:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1077 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Jude Beaudin writes:
> > Is there a contemporaneous format to which LCD could apply? (honest question)
>
> Not sure. LEGO(r)'s own internal format? There IS one but few know details.
> The LEGO Creator(tm) format? In fact one would speculate that a "good"
> Creator-like program would need this info to be workable.
I dunno if this could apply or not, depends on how LEGO's format is written.
(I don't know details) That's a question for the person who designed their
format (and I doubt they'd discuss it here) ;-)
> LEOCad(tm) uses same/different format? Not sure. Shows what I know!
I believe its the same library, but a different format. Leo, could you clarify?
Also, suggestion, perhaps it might be a good idea for you to clarify that on
your website, if it isn't already. If it is, I must have missed it, or been
too much of an airhead to catch it. ;-)
> > LEGO is sensitive about the use of their name. [No different than GoB(tm)]
>
> GRIN. Um, yes, true. But of course there ARE other examples of using LEGO in
> acronyms. Can you think of one off hand? (hint, you're typing in its general
> direction)...
I think in an acronym is different to them than using the name outright.
Why do you think the name 'brick' is so popular in the community? To
represent LEGO but not say LEGO outright. 'Brickbay,' 'Brickshelf,'
'Brickset,' 'BrickFest,' 'BricksWest' etc etc...
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LCD - LEGO Connection Database - Proposal
|
| (...) Well that's kind of my point. LCD is an acronym, just as LUGNET(tm) is. So I don't see LCD standing for "LEGO(r) <mumble> <mumble>" as being bad or wrong per se any more than that LUGNET stands for "LEGO Users Group NETwork" being bad or wrong (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LCD - LEGO Connection Database - Proposal
|
| (...) Not sure. LEGO(r)'s own internal format? There IS one but few know details. The LEGO Creator(tm) format? In fact one would speculate that a "good" Creator-like program would need this info to be workable. LEOCad(tm) uses same/different format? (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
80 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
