Subject:
|
Re: LCD - LDraw Connection Database - Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 02:25:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3342 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kyle McDonald writes:
> Kiss Attila Csongor (KACS) wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Kyle McDonald writes:
> >
> > > Michael Horvath wrote:
> > >
> > > > You're forgetting one important connection! The connection between
> > >
> > > the tire and the road surface. What about that?
> > >
> > > > -Mike
> > >
> > > But now that you bring it up, it would be nice for the wheel's
> > > function to be able to update the models position when they are
> > > notified that the axle has rotated - But jeez... now you're
> > > practically talking about a full simulation environment... That's
> > > alot to do on a home PC.
> > >
> > > -Kyle
> >
> > Hi guys!
> >
> > What are you talking about? It's written in the proposal:
> >
> > "Finally, a user turns a battery switch on and the car wheels start
> > rotating; and if there is a surface below the car, that can be observed as a
> > connection and the car will start running on."
> >
> > But now that you bring it up again, it means it's really an important type
> > of connection! ;)
> >
> > Keep it up guys and THX!
>
> Well I think we were talking more about how to actually implement
> it. How it would actually work.
I think there is some examples in the proposal too.
> When you get into trying to model these things, I don't think this
> is the type of thing we can store in either the .DAT file or some
> new database. Alot of this stuff will need to be stored in the model
> I think, and written up (or almost programmed) by the model designer.
>
> That means (unless I'm missing something) developing almost a whole
> programming language for embeding in a model.
Yes, I understand you! It would be a programming language based on and
according to the LCD. It would be LMPL - LDraw Model Programming Language.
How about that? :)
But, I think we need to work out fine the LCD itself. And now we can keep it
in mind the LCD must be prepared to be a base to LMPL. Hm, sounds great,
isn't it?
> Or am I just being dense? It's been a long day ;^)
Hehe, it's 3:23am here, and now I will go to sleep. ;)
___
/___\__ Bye: KACS, The BrickaMocka
|o o|
_\_~_/_ E-mail: kacs69@freemail.hu
/|LEGO |\ kacs@makacs.hu
//|_____|\\
C |==|==| C Brick, Brick Hurray! :)
|__|__|
__I__I__I_________________< The Bat! 1.53d >_
Maybe my Minifig above needs the LCD? ;)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LCD - LDraw Connection Database - Proposal
|
| (...) I think the idea of having an LMPL separate from the LCD is definitely a good idea. Not everyone is going to want to do animation or whatnot - I know that I'm personally more interested in just having a good way to connect the parts together. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LCD - LDraw Connection Database - Proposal
|
| (...) Well I think we were talking more about how to actually implement it. How it would actually work. When you get into trying to model these things, I don't think this is the type of thing we can store in either the .DAT file or some new (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
80 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
