Subject:
|
Re: LCD - LEGO Connection Database - Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:25:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1022 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
> > A note worthy of some serious consideration, I got a priavte email from Jude
> > Beaudin, who suggested the name might infringe on LEGO's interests. He
> > suggested the project be renamed to 'LDraw Connection Database' instead,
> > preserving the acronym and making it more accurate. Its a connection
> > database for the parts in the LDraw library.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Is it restricted in applicability to just LDraw parts? (that is, if there
> were a competing parts format, could the idea be applicable? Could the
> database (perhaps with coordinate transformation) itself?
Is there a contemporaneous format to which LCD could apply? (honest question)
>
> If it's not restricted (and I think it's not) then I don't see using LDraw
> in the name. It DOES get around using LEGO(r), but that isn't necessarily
> bad, is it?
LEGO is sensitive about the use of their name. [No different than GoB(tm)]
>
> What does LDraw stand for, after all?
I think it now stands for LDraw, formerly it was something like LEGO Draw.
Kinda like I work at EDS, formerly Electronic Data Systems, but now it
stands for EDS.
I just want to try to save us[1] a future hassel if possible.
Jude
[1] users of LDraw
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LCD - LEGO Connection Database - Proposal
|
| (...) Not sure. LEGO(r)'s own internal format? There IS one but few know details. The LEGO Creator(tm) format? In fact one would speculate that a "good" Creator-like program would need this info to be workable. LEOCad(tm) uses same/different format? (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: LCD - LEGO Connection Database - Proposal
|
| (...) I would assume BlockCAD. Anton? Though compatibility problems might arise if my assumption is correct about center points on parts - if LCD is (and I believe it most definitely will be) designed around the LDraw library, and that is a factor, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LCD - LEGO Connection Database - Proposal
|
| (...) Is it restricted in applicability to just LDraw parts? (that is, if there were a competing parts format, could the idea be applicable? Could the database (perhaps with coordinate transformation) itself? If it's not restricted (and I think it's (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
80 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
