Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:08:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
288 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> But I'd be much more interested in your response to my question... why
> bother with this scientific creationist nonsense? Why do you creationists
> have this inexplicable need to try to prove a myth real in the face of
> overwhelming countervailing evidence?
Even more interesting to me is the question of why creationists feel
compelled to "prove" their mythology using the very science that their
mythology invalidates by definition.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| Snippety Snip. (...) Faked, faked... always with this faked. You sound like a broken record. Everything that you can't explain away must be faked, right? I found this quote from one of the creationist resources rather interesting((URL) By basing our (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
95 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
