Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:13:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
400 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Steve Chapple writes:
> > > - The fossil record does not support evolution.
> >
> > You're likely referring to the so-called absence of so-called "transition
> > fossils" that would supposedly link arbitrarily chosen stages of evolution.
> > First of all, if I provide you with a link between, say, reptiles and birds,
> > you'll ask for a link between reptiles and link1, and then for a link between
> > link1 and link2, and so on ad infinitum.
>
> Ad infinitum? No I won't. The only links I've heard of have been faked.
> The recent reptile/bird fake that made the cover? of National Geographic
> being a great example.
As Bruce and I have pointed out countless times previously, *EVERY*
organism that ever lived is a transitional form, fossil or otherwise.
Further, my "ad infinitum" comment is a straightforward rhetorical
consequence of demanding a transitional record. How many examples are enough?
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) Ad infinitum? No I won't. The only links I've heard of have been faked. The recent reptile/bird fake that made the cover? of National Geographic being a great example. If cats really evolved from dogs (my example - feel free to adjust it to (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
95 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
