Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Feb 2001 21:53:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
488 times
|
| |
|
|
SRC wrote:
> Doesn't science involve repeatable and verifiable "lab tests"?
> Isn't studying fossils and putting forth a theory based upon those
> fossils something more within the field of archeology than science?
I thought archeology was a science?
from m-w.com
1 : the scientific study of material remains (as fossil relics,
artifacts, and monuments) of past human life and activities
-chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) I've read some general statements which make huge assumptions. What I'm asking for is some evidence - Some simple basic evidence. (...) If I don't accept Darwinism, (or "macro-evolution" or whatever the preferred name is) how does that mean I (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
95 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
