Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:03:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
405 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Low writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Snippety Snip.
> > ditto
> >
> > But I'd be much more interested in your response to my question... why
> > bother with this scientific creationist nonsense? Why do you creationists
> > have this inexplicable need to try to prove a myth real in the face of
> > overwhelming countervailing evidence?
>
> Democracy, individual human rights and the concept of "property" are all
> myths too, and myths with much shorter history in human culture than the
> idea of a divine creator. They're also less rational than belief in God. If
> we accept a literal understanding of the Bible as axiomatic, then
> creationism makes sense as an undertaking.
Well, this is an interesting take! Do expound, sounds like fertile ground
for discussion, unlike creationism.
I would think that property and rights are inventions before I'd think they
were myths.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) Democracy, individual human rights and the concept of "property" are all myths too, and myths with much shorter history in human culture than the idea of a divine creator. They're also less rational than belief in God. If we accept a literal (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
95 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
