To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9174
9173  |  9175
Subject: 
Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:10:37 GMT
Viewed: 
446 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
Snippety Snip.
ditto

But I'd be much more interested in your response to my question... why
bother with this scientific creationist nonsense? Why do you creationists
have this inexplicable need to try to prove a myth real in the face of
overwhelming countervailing evidence?

Democracy, individual human rights and the concept of "property" are all
myths too, and myths with much shorter history in human culture than the
idea of a divine creator. They're also less rational than belief in God. If
we accept a literal understanding of the Bible as axiomatic, then
creationism makes sense as an undertaking.

The part I don't get is why a literal reading of the Bible and clearly
subjective[1] reading of the universe is preferable to a contextual
interpretation of religion and the simplest, most complete, understanding of
the world. Given that the divine is revealed in both words and nature, why
choose fallible human communication to the indefinitely refinable process of
science.

--DaveL

[1] Since it depends on a personal belief in God.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
 
(...) Well, this is an interesting take! Do expound, sounds like fertile ground for discussion, unlike creationism. I would think that property and rights are inventions before I'd think they were myths. ++Lar (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
 
(...) Further, there is no one "literal" interpretation of the Bible, since every conscious reader will by necessity arrive at a different interpretation, just as with any text. Dave! (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
 
Snippety Snip. (...) Faked, faked... always with this faked. You sound like a broken record. Everything that you can't explain away must be faked, right? I found this quote from one of the creationist resources rather interesting((URL) By basing our (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

95 Messages in This Thread:





































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR