To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8022
8021  |  8023
Subject: 
Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:39:52 GMT
Viewed: 
7015 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:

> When I was working at a Krogers in college in the Seafood dept, I had several
> people ask me if food stamps could be used to buy lobster.  I also saw people
> buying sirloin with foodstamps.
> 
> Why should someone that is on foodstamps be able to eat better than someone
> working for their food?  Why should the person working for their food pay for
> the other to buy better food than they can?

  Testify, brother!  I worked at a 7-11 some years ago, and a new car with
the factory sticker on it pulled into the lot.  Out climbed a guy in an
expensive and new-looking suit, and he came in and bought his candy bar with
foodstamps.  On the other side of the spectrum, a known drug dealer
routinely came in during the night shift, and he'd always buy a bag of chips
or something small.  From his pocket he'd produce a big fistful of 50's and
100's, but he'd pay using a crumpled foodstamp tucked in the middle of the cash.
  Similarly, I once saw a mom and six kids trot through the store in
sequence, each trying to use a $1 foodstamp to buy a $.05 piece of gum,
netting each of them $.95 to spend on whatever they wanted.
  These are, I recognize, anecdotal examples rather than
universally-consistent standards of abuse, but they point out some of the
shortcomings of the system.

> I also saw many people buying the necessities only, in order to feed a large
> family when they were in tough times.  But the current system is too easy to >abuse, it needs a rework.

  What about a system of vouchers (for lack of a better word) specifically
coded for particular purchases, for which no change need be given.  A coupon
for chicken, or milk, or bread, for instance, rather than a means to fleece
the merchant et al?  I mean, if a person is living on the government dime,
whether for legitimate reasons or not, why should they not be given specific
rules for acceptable purchases?

     Dave!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
 
(...) When I was working at a Krogers in college in the Seafood dept, I had several people ask me if food stamps could be used to buy lobster. I also saw people buying sirloin with foodstamps. Why should someone that is on foodstamps be able to eat (...) (26 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

78 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR