To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26128
26127  |  26129
Subject: 
Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:58:02 GMT
Viewed: 
2440 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: SNIP
   First of all, I’m not sure that I would worship any being for two reasons:

Any entity who requires my worship isn’t worthy of my worship.

Any entity who’d be bothered by my lack of worship isn’t worthy of my worship. • SNIP Dave!

Sorry for bringing up an old thread, and for beating a dead horse. It’s not in my nature to evangelize, but the Catholic in me has been bothered by these two statements. I’ve been reflecting on it for a long time, and came up with a way of describing God’s need for our love of him that has actually deepened my faith.

Now I’m not trying to convert anyone, but for some strange reason I feel compelled to defend my faith publically. I just feel the need to write it down. Feel free to criticise me but I’m probably not going to continue with this defense beyond what I write in this post.

First, for the sake of argument, let us assume certain doctrines of the Catholic (Christian) faith are true:

God created Man in his own image and gave him free will.

God is without sin, whereas Man has sin.

Sins are evil and vice versa.



So assuming the above is true, then we can infer that

God + Sin = Man

Of course, this is really over-simplified, you know, removing that whole dominion over heaven and earth that God has and Mankind falsely believes it has.

So if God + Sin = Man, then we can accept that everything that isn’t evil about mankind is good (or neutral, but we’re simplifying this).

Which would mean that everything that is good about Man is also shared with God. That is to say, God is the personification of everything that is good about Mankind.

These good things are things like love, kindness, hope, faith, joy, mercy, that sort of thing.

So if Man was created to be just like God (in his image), and if God is the personification of everything that is good about Mankind, then we can infer that all these good things about God are shared by Man, and vice versa.


Which brings me to my whole point.

A woman gives birth to a child. I’m not talking Jesus and Mary, just some random woman and random child.

Now that woman, after successfully delivering that child, does not need that child to survive. Biologically, a mother or father is not dependant on a child in any way, shape or form.

But emotionally, there is a bond between parent and child, which we would call parental love, that draws the parent to protect and raise the child. Sure it’s a batch of chemicals surging through our bodies, but it’s there none the less. It really isn’t easy to explain it, it just happens. The bond is instant and permanent.

When I child grows up, the parent wishes that child to have a life of it’s own, to live a happy life, and to prosper. Ideally, the parent does not control the child, but rather does its’ best to steer the child in the ‘right’ direction.

If the child spurns the parent, then the parent hurts emotionally. The parent will always long to be recognized and loved by it’s child.



I think anyone would be hard pressed to find a single person who would classify the parental love between parent and child as anything but good.


So if parental love is good, and mankind displays parental love, and if mankind shares all things good with God, then God should then display parental love as well.

God created us, has tried to steer us in the right direction, but has never controled us (that free will he gave us). He doesn’t need us, without us He is still God.

God does not require anything from us, either. To require something from us, to force us to do something, is to interfere with free will.

But if God has a parental love for Mankind, then the reason God needs our love and recognition is simply because of this parental love. God is our parent (father IMO), and He loves us regardless of what we do. He will always love us and does not demand from us anything.

Yes, in the Old Testament God was pretty strict and stern, but so isn’t a parent with any young child. The child needs guidance and needs to be steered in the ‘right direction.’ Similarly, God guided the people of the Old Testament in the ‘right direction’ by doing what He needed to do.

But now Mankind is all grown up. Mankind is an ‘adult’ now, with a life of its’ own. We’ve been given all the guidance and direction we need (the Bible), and what we do with it is up to us. We may choose to spurn religion and a divine being in general, or we may love and recognize our celestial parent.

God doesn’t require our worship, but He asks us to love him (and each other), just as any parent would ask of its’ children.

God needs us because He loves us.

And that’s all I have to say about that.

--Anthony



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) Hi Anthony: Thanks for taking the time to reply. Even if you choose not to respond after this post, I hope you'll read my response, if only to get a sense of where I'm coming from. (...) I must confess that I'm not comfortable with at least (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) I'd like God a whole lot better if he'd just bother to show up once and awhile instead of being such a deadbeat dad... Spencer (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) How so? (And I ask this sincerely!) (...) My spider-sense tells me that this is an attempt to trick me into formulating an ontological argument for God's existence, but I'll give it a try anyway. First of all, I'm not sure that I would worship (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

62 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR