Subject:
|
Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.ancient
|
Followup-To:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Original-Followup-To:
|
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:35:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4046 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.ancient, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> The whole thing as in the Bible itself, or your whole version of the juicy bits?
> Or both?
It's just that I find so much of the Bible to be "juicy", whether it's because
the stories are surprising, utterly outrageous, or just fun. That book is just
loaded with good stuff. There won't be very much, in the end, that I'll have
considered "too boring" to illustrate.
> Anyway, illustrators can put a spin on things the same way a
> politician can.
I won't arue with that, but I do think that it's a lot easier to spin the
stories when you completely put them in your own words, leaving parts out, and
adding parts not in the original, which is what every other illustrated Bible
I've ever seen does.
-Brendan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
62 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
