Ancient : 639


Building / Ancient / 639	638 \| 640

Subject:	Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
Newsgroups:	lugnet.build.ancient
Followup-To:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:36:04 GMT
Viewed:	4379 times

In lugnet.build.ancient, Brendan Powell Smith wrote:

In lugnet.build.ancient, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:

Still grinding the same axe?

Hmm? Well, still illustrating the same book...

Either people have gotten the point by now or are too blind to understand.

In my opinion, The Brick Testament itself does not make an argument for or against Christianity, Judaism, or any religion. It merely presents evidence for consideration.

At least be honest. Your “work” is mockery. It must be very amusing to you to have Christians praise the stories in the BT. Suckers! ;-)

JOHN

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
(...) A MOCery, perhaps... <groan> Brenden is just illustrating the words, he's not changing them or editing them in any way. I don't see how you can consider that mocking the good book. JohnG, GMLTC (21 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
(...) Hmm? Well, still illustrating the same book... (...) In my opinion, The Brick Testament itself does not make an argument for or against Christianity, Judaism, or any religion. It merely presents evidence for consideration. And in my view, (...) (21 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)

62 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search