Subject:
|
Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.ancient
|
Followup-To:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Original-Followup-To:
|
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:08:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3774 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.ancient, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> Still grinding the same axe?
Hmm? Well, still illustrating the same book...
> Either people have gotten the point by now or are
> too blind to understand.
In my opinion, The Brick Testament itself does not make an argument for or
against Christianity, Judaism, or any religion. It merely presents evidence for
consideration. And in my view, there is a lot of evidence to be brought to
light, much of which has been previously unseen, ignored, or greatly downplayed.
I could stop now or at any point, but I do feel that there is plenty more
interesting evidence to consider. Also, the more I illustrate, the weaker the
potential charge becomes that I am only presenting some small, non-standard,
unrepresentative part of the Bible, implicitly suggesting that people use just
that small sample to judge the whole thing.
I would far prefer that people judge the whole thing, but it seems that many
people, believers or not, never read the whole thing, much less see it
illustrated in a frank manner.
> Of course, if you just like illustrating stories, I suppose I won't argue with
> that. :-)
Oh, right. There's that too. @8^)
-Brendan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
62 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
