To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.ancientOpen lugnet.build.ancient in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Ancient / 640
639  |  641
Subject: 
Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.ancient
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Original-Followup-To: 

Date: 
Wed, 8 Sep 2004 04:26:11 GMT
Viewed: 
3871 times
  
In lugnet.build.ancient, Brendan Powell Smith wrote:
In lugnet.build.ancient, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
Still grinding the same axe?

Hmm?  Well, still illustrating the same book...

Either people have gotten the point by now or are
too blind to understand.

In my opinion, The Brick Testament itself does not make an argument for or
against Christianity, Judaism, or any religion.  It merely presents evidence for
consideration.  And in my view, there is a lot of evidence to be brought to
light, much of which has been previously unseen, ignored, or greatly downplayed.

It depends if you want to consider each and every point individually (which
seems like a valid approach to me) or are trying to present an overall point
that perhaps you have flogged to death already.

Having said that, I'm not sure what real bearing my comments have, since if you
enjoy doing it and others enjoy looking at it, that's enough in itself.
Certainly I enjoy the technical aspects of your Lego storytelling enough to keep
reading.


I could stop now or at any point, but I do feel that there is plenty more
interesting evidence to consider.  Also, the more I illustrate, the weaker the
potential charge becomes that I am only presenting some small, non-standard,
unrepresentative part of the Bible, implicitly suggesting that people use just
that small sample to judge the whole thing.

Certainly valid points.


I would far prefer that people judge the whole thing, but it seems that many
people, believers or not, never read the whole thing, much less see it
illustrated in a frank manner.

The whole thing as in the Bible itself, or your whole version of the juicy bits?
Or both?  Anyway, illustrators can put a spin on things the same way a
politician can. Probably wouldn't be any good if they didn't. though.  :-)


-->Bruce<--



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) It's just that I find so much of the Bible to be "juicy", whether it's because the stories are surprising, utterly outrageous, or just fun. That book is just loaded with good stuff. There won't be very much, in the end, that I'll have (...) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) Hmm? Well, still illustrating the same book... (...) In my opinion, The Brick Testament itself does not make an argument for or against Christianity, Judaism, or any religion. It merely presents evidence for consideration. And in my view, (...) (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)

62 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR