To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25582
25581  |  25583
Subject: 
Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:14:18 GMT
Viewed: 
1568 times
  
"John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message news:I3rK7M.E7B@lugnet.com...

You've missed my point.  How about this: a Jewish comedian pokes fun at • Rabbi in
a joke.  A Muslim comedian pokes fun at a Rabbi in a joke.  Is not one • perceived
as anti-semitism and one not?

It would depend on many things, including context and delivery.

Because I think that they would assume that the stories in question were • created
in by someone who revered the stories that they depicted.

So if they were created  by a person such a this, and appeared in the same
way as those created by Brendan, would that be ok then? From what I see, the
person reading them would still get exactly the same from them as before.

I've been told that Charles Mingus was a bit of a tyrant. This, however,
takes nothing away from the quality of his music nor the enjoyment thereof.

Jennifer



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) You aren't being serious. (...) Skin color wasn't the issue; it was a racial issue. (...) You've missed my point. How about this: a Jewish comedian pokes fun at Rabbi in a joke. A Muslim comedian pokes fun at a Rabbi in a joke. Is not one (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

62 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR