Subject:
|
Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:45:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1603 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Brendan Powell Smith wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Ah, well, I should’ve kept my fingers shut because I don’t have the time or
inclination to “go there” (again) WRT to this topic, but here is an analogy
to consider: why can a black person call another black person the “N” word
(if even with affection) but a white person cannot?
|
To stick with your analogy for a moment, can Michael Jackson, as a former
black person, call a currently black person the “N” word?
|
You aren’t being serious.
| |
Not that I think this is a very good analogy. Having dark skin is really not
analagous to subscribing to a religion.
|
Skin color wasn’t the issue; it was a racial issue.
| |
And whereas a non-black person calling a black person the “N” word is a pure
insult without supporting evidence, The Brick Testament is all evidence
without insult.
|
You’ve missed my point. How about this: a Jewish comedian pokes fun at Rabbi in
a joke. A Muslim comedian pokes fun at a Rabbi in a joke. Is not one perceived
as anti-semitism and one not?
| |
| |
It must be very amusing to you
to have Christians praise the stories in the BT. Suckers! ;-)
|
If a person holds a particular story from the Bible as praiseworthy, why
wouldn’t they also praise my quoted-directly-from-scripture retelling of the
same story (so long as the illustrations are also praiseworthy from an
aesthetic standpoint)? Why is such a person a “sucker”?
|
Because I think that they would assume that the stories in question were created
in by someone who revered the stories that they depicted.
| |
I appreciate the Christian and Jewish fans of The Brick Testament even if I do
not hold the same religious beliefs as they do. I am always happy to give
permission to ministers and Sunday school teachers who ask to use my
illustrations in their classes. I do not consider them “suckers”. I do not
expect that their doing so will make atheists out of their students, nor would
it upset me if it made their students stronger believers in their religion.
I’m just glad they would be getting a chance to see these stories presented in
a frank manner, maybe get a little amusement, and be in a better position to
make up their own minds about whether or not these stories (and not merely the
illustrations) are praiseworthy.
|
It’s interesting that you think that viewing the BT stories would put someone in
a better position to make a judgment on the merit of the story itself (or even
the Bible for that matter).
| |
John, I’ll understand if you do not want this to develop into another big ol’
time-consuming debate. We can agree to disagree at any point.
|
I appreciate that, Brendan.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
62 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
