To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.ancientOpen lugnet.build.ancient in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Ancient / 642
641  |  643
Subject: 
Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.ancient
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Original-Followup-To: 

Date: 
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 00:39:18 GMT
Viewed: 
4233 times
  
In lugnet.build.ancient, Brendan Powell Smith wrote:
In lugnet.build.ancient, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:

Anyway, illustrators can put a spin on things the same way a
politician can.

I won't arue with that, but I do think that it's a lot easier to spin the
stories when you completely put them in your own words, leaving parts out, and
adding parts not in the original, which is what every other illustrated Bible
I've ever seen does.



I agree with that assessment, but that still doesn't mean that you haven't put
your own spin on things.  Example (since that idiot reporter wanted to represent
all of Lugnet with this particular episode): is there any part of the Bible that
says the circumcisions were done in a notably indifferent fashion that left the
men lying in massive pools of their own blood?  It tells the story visually,
yes, but is it really accurate?  I'm not arguing it as a storytelling device,
but this is the visual equivalent of putting your own words in.

One can play the scene for laughs, for horror, for an excuse to present
traditional practices accurately and historically (or inaccurately for
propaganda effects), or just because all you had to work with was Lego and that
was the best storytelling device that came to mind.  Likewise, hiding out for
the night at a prostitute's place in a hostile city does not necessarily mean
that Our Two Heroes indulged in a (pun alert) sod display of sexual depravity.
It didn't even give the Biblical version of politically correct "and they knew
her" to justify the scene.

But then again, they probably took a few "freebies" on account.  It's good to be
chosen!  ;-)


-->Bruce<--



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) I'd agree with Bruce here, and also note that every other illustrated Bible also inserts its own spin/commentary in its illustrations. I think the BT rocks, but I disagree that the illustrations don't carry any commentary about the text or the (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)
  Request to divert non-Lego build discussions
 
(...) May I ask that non-Lego discussions be moved to the non-Lego area of Lugnet? (lugnet.off-topic.debate is usually a good choice). This thread diverged from discussion about building ancient creations a few posts ago. Thanks, Clark Curator (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) It's just that I find so much of the Bible to be "juicy", whether it's because the stories are surprising, utterly outrageous, or just fun. That book is just loaded with good stuff. There won't be very much, in the end, that I'll have (...) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)

62 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR