Subject:
|
Re: Terrorists hate freedom (was Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:39:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
455 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
| |
What you are failing to take into account is that Evil Leaders do not
represent their countries, they oppress them. Iraq is a good country
with good people; we always believed that. The problem was their leader.
|
SH only became a “problem” after he invaded Q8... i.e. he was America’s
friend when he perpetrated many of his worst crimes.
|
Much in the same way Stalin was our “friend” during WWII.
|
Show me how that analogy is relevant.
| |
| |
| |
Anyone who suggests that negotiating with terrorists will achieve peace has
simply failed to learn the lessons of other conflicts in other places in
other times
|
You condone the killing of children in Iraq. If “shock and awe” was not
terrorism, what was it?
|
Yeah, and when did you stop beating your wife, Scott? I do not condone the
killing of Iraqi children; I mourn the killing of Iraqi children.
|
Get a dictionary, and see what “condone” actually means. Then look up “cluster
bomb”... a weapon of indiscriminate destruction.
You are a
| |
jerk for saying so. Iraqi civilians were not targets. Terrorism targets
civilians.
|
Did I say civilians were targets at any point?
| |
Sorry, I’ve had my fill of pointless debate today.
|
No, you have had your fill of very selective “snips”. ;)
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
93 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
