To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23488
23487  |  23489
Subject: 
Re: Terrorists hate freedom (was Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:52:31 GMT
Viewed: 
329 times
  
   What you are failing to take into account is that Evil Leaders do not represent their countries, they oppress them. Iraq is a good country with good people; we always believed that. The problem was their leader.

SH only became a “problem” after he invaded Q8... i.e. he was America’s friend when he perpetrated many of his worst crimes.

   North Korea is a hell-hole of oppression because of KIJ. This is why Democracy is so important-- it gives the power to the people!

   But its an alternative process to armed conflict. And the quality of this process, its inclusivity, transparency and equity is what guarantees a stand down of hostility by terrorists. It is the absence of a perception of a viable alternative that drives violent insurrection.


I’m sorry Richard, but you are simply wrong. You cannot negotiate with terrorists.

Tell that to the ANC & IRA. BTW: which terrorist groups have been beaten with force?

   The problem is that there are people in this world who don’t value rational thought.

Indeed!


  
Anyone who suggests that negotiating with terrorists will achieve peace has simply failed to learn the lessons of other conflicts in other places in other times

You mean like in south affica and NI?

  
   When it comes to the test, against all odds, it is more likely that body that overpowers the lash. Terrorism can be reduced in this way, sure, but not vanquished, and it can get a lot worse, and any improvement comes at what cost to the cherished freedoms of the community?

So what are you suggesting???? Not oppose terrorism because you fear that you might make it worse??? Give in to terrorism? I’m sorry, but the only solution is to fight it until those who desire change are willing to go about it in a civil manner.

Don’t be a fool. Remember countries like Israel & South Africa owe a lot to terrorism. Although I don’t condone violence, sometimes terrorists have a point! OBL does not like the House of Saud; I think he has a point. Hammas claim Israel is an oppressive regime; they have a point. It is their actions that are wrong; not some of their motives!


  
   So put away your tribal colours and big guns and crotch-first gait, and start thinking about what could possibly motivate you to behave like the people you call terrorists, to sacrifice your life in the service of something that will likely not benefit you at all.

That’s the point!!!! There is NOTHING that would ever motivate me to deliberately and savagely kill INNOCENT CHILDREN! These people are beyond rational thinking.

You condone the killing of children in Iraq. If “shock and awe” was not terrorism, what was it?



   You do not understand the problem of Islamo-terrorism I am afraid. The simple truth is that it has nothing to do with economics. This is about religious intolerance; you are a target because you are not one of them, not because you oppress them in some way.

Can you justify that?

  
   The litany ‘there is simply no excuse for terrorism’ echoes loud from those who stand to gain the most from the preservation of the status quo.

So what? It doesn’t negate the Truth of the statement.

   It fails to realise that this is no answer for those who are abjectly prevented from sharing in the bounty of the status quo.

Again, you fail to comprehend the situation.

   Terrorism is a perfectly logical and inevitable result of a resilient, clever, passionate and aspiring humanity

Serioulsy, this is one of the most offensive things I have ever seen printed! God, I hope you reconsider and retract what you just wrote.



  
  
Perhaps John meant it as a light-hearted poke.

Absolutely not! I stand by that statement. Perhaps you’d like to explain how the killing of innocent people is an example of “freedom loving”

Perhaps you can justify why Bush is funding the murder of civilians in Uzbekistan & Israel. Is that “freedom loving”?

  
   I seem to read similar things said in all seriousness, and I feel the blood drain from my face in fear. Terrorism is a scary thing, but the state that fails to recognise the humanity of everyone, and institutionalises the imbalances and social injustices that creates the need for terrorism, is only scarier.

Evil is evil Richard. Perpetrating evil to combat evil results in evil-- there is no difference.

:0

Scott A

  
JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Terrorists hate freedom (was Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles)
 
(...) Much in the same way Stalin was our "friend" during WWII. (...) Yeah, and when did you stop beating your wife, Scott? I do not condone the killing of Iraqi children; I mourn the killing of Iraqi children. You are a jerk for saying so. Iraqi (...) (20 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Terrorists hate freedom (was Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles)
 
(...) "Loving Freedom" doesn't mean "Loving Freedom for me". Denying others' rights to win your own hardly qualifies someone as a "freedom lover"-- more like a disgusting hypocrite. (...) Oppression never justifies the murder of innocents. What is (...) (20 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

93 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR