Subject:
|
Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:19:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
281 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
| |
| |
Iraq showed us all that
Bush pays “Christianity” little more than lip service.
|
Don’t follow you there.
|
As I understand it, most Christian theologians and church leaders were
against the “war”.
|
“Christianity” and opinions (especially political ones) of particular
Christians are not synonymous.
|
In all seriousness, how do you define “Christianity?” I would suggest that the
answer cannot be “the teachings of Christ according to scripture,” because that
answer, for all practical purposes, reduces to “the opinions of particular
Christians,” since Christ’s teachings, as written, are subject to widely
differing interpretations.
Thanks for your input, however!
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) The religion of the believers and followers of Jesus the Christ (Messiah). (...) Jesus' teachings were obviously important, but don't forget His work as Savior, dying for the sins of all people and thereby justifying the world to God. JOHN (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
93 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
