Subject:
|
Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:21:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
291 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Thomas Stangl wrote:
| |
John wrote:
| |
Even in hindsight I believe that SH’s deposition was still a good thing
because he was a menace and a friend of terrorists. I believe it is totally
appropriate to threaten any and all leaders of any nation who aid and
abett terrorists. (Please shock me and refrain from mentioning Israel...;-)
|
So you have no problem threatening our own leaders (watch it, with the Patriot
Act, you might be locked up for life with no trial on this one...)?
|
Let me clarify: I believe it is totally appropriate
to threaten any and all leaders of any nation who aid and abett
terrorists who threaten our national security.
| |
Our leaders supported the Taliban, after all...
|
Against a greater threat, namely the USSR.
| |
Our leaders supported SH, after all...
|
Against a greater threat, namely Iran.
| |
(I’m too lazy to dig up more references, but we have supported others too).
|
How about Stalin? I see nothing inconsistent with supporting the lesser of 2
threats against the other. In all cases, when the greater threat is removed,
the lesser threat is then opposed.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) So you have no problem threatening our own leaders (watch it, with the Patriot Act, you might be locked up for life with no trial on this one...)? Our leaders supported the Taliban, after all... Our leaders supported SH, after all... (I'm too (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
