Subject:
|
Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:31:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
327 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
|
| |
| |
Let me introduce you to my counter-argument: Winchester Model 1897 12 gauge
Boomstick. You’ll only get my Lego when you pry it from my cold dead
fingers (with a brick-separator). :-)
|
lol, But -->Bruce<-- I would have expected a little snickersnee from you!
Nonetheless, Kewl-- does it still fire, and more importantly: do your Liberal
buddies know you own a gun;-)
|
Works fine - actually, I had no idea what model it was until I just looked. I
presumed it was some thing my grandfather got in the 60’s - which he may have,
but by it’s serial number it is actually 100 years old (1904). Dang.
Snickersnee? Well...close! Actually it is a bolo knife (a snickersnee being
some kind of vague “large knife”). At two and a half feet long, I’d call that
large!
“One-two, one two, and through and through,
the vorpal blade went snickersnack”
| |
| |
Yes, but I believe the lowest pit of hell isn’t reserved for all
politicians, just those from Texas (though Nixon has done his darnedest to
crash the party).
|
lol I would have said Massachusetts, long before JFKerry appeared! The ones
from Texas would probably appreciate the cooler weather though;-)
|
ROFLMAO!
| |
| |
| |
The issue is whether the government can recognize a marriage that is
defined as a union between 1 man and 1 woman and have that not violate
equal protection. I think it can.
|
And if it can, might it not decide tomorrow that marriage can’t include
people of two different races? I’d rather not have the government telling
me what I can and cannot do.
|
That’s not the issue. It’s one of recognition. You can marry and do
whatever you want to do.
|
Currently.
| |
| |
They are taking a shortcut. Either their action stands, saving the
taxpayers the court costs (because the goverment figures its laws won’t
stand up and the court action is a waste of time and money) or it takes the
case to court which is the net same effect.
|
Well, how parsimonious. Since when are Democrats interested in saving
instead of spending?
|
ANNNNNNHHHHH! Wrong guess, Hans. My party is the color of my eyes (on a
non-smoggy day, ya smart-alec).
Actually, I don’t see a lot of difference on the “spending” front between
Democrats and Republicans (beyond they have different agendas for the money).
Democrats want to tax, though, and Republicans want to borrow and pretend like
it doesn’t work out to the same.
| |
| |
Further, issuing marriage licenses doesn’t
mean that they have any legal weight, so in effect why seek confrontation
when you have an effective pocket veto? The game-playing by both sides has
hardly begun!
|
It makes me wonder what benefit gays think they are deriving from this
“stand”. It will most certainly backfire and elicit far more acrimony towards
their “cause” than any small amount of good obtained.
|
Defeat of the narrow-minded?
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) I've got a bolo tie... (...) I read that too early in my life-- never got it. (...) lol Just rented that to watch with my son a while back (catching him up on all of the classics:-) (...) lol If you are going to lob a fat one over the plate, (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) lol, But -->Bruce<-- I would have expected a little snickersnee from you! Nonetheless, Kewl-- does it still fire, and more importantly: do your Liberal buddies know you own a gun;-) (...) lol I would have said Massachusetts, long before (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
